Cited by 16Bioinformatics and Genomic NetworksGenetic Associations and EpidemiologyGene expression and cancer classification

A general framework for integrative analysis of incomplete multiomics data

Open access
Lin, Dan‐Yu, Zeng, Donglin, Couper, David·2020·Genetic Epidemiology

Abstract

There is a tremendous current interest in measuring multiple types of omics features (e.g., DNA sequences, RNA expressions, methylation profiles, metabolic profiles, protein expressions) on a large number of subjects. Although genotypes are typically available for all study subjects, other data types may be measured only on a subset of subjects due to cost or other constraints. In addition, quantitative omics measurements, such as metabolite levels and protein expressions, are subject to detection limits in that the measurements below (or above) certain thresholds are not detectable. In this article, we propose a rigorous and powerful approach to handle missing values and detection limits in integrative analysis of multiomics data. We relate quantitative omics variables to genetic variants and other variables through linear regression models and relate phenotypes to quantitative omics variables and other variables through generalized linear models. We derive the joint-likelihood for the two sets of models by allowing arbitrary patterns of missing values and detection limits for quantitative omics variables. We carry out maximum-likelihood estimation through computationally fast and stable algorithms. The resulting estimators are approximately unbiased and statistically efficient. An application to a major study on chronic obstructive lung disease yielded new biological insights.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gepi.22328

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • iMODA's power to detect effects of interest varies with the proportion of missing data, and power decreases as missingness increases.

    “The power of the iMODA framework to detect the effects of interest has been reported to vary according to the proportion of data that are missing. The authors considered cases where 50% and 30% of data were missing, finding that power decreases with increased missingness.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, D., Zeng, D., & Couper, D.
Affiliations
  • Department of Biostatistics University of North Carolina Chapel Hill North Carolina
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Venue
Genetic Epidemiology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-07-21
Volume
44
Issue
7
Pages
646-664
ISSN
  • 0741-0395 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-2272
OpenAlex
W3044532026
Cited by
16
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1
FWCI
0.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genetic Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Carolina Digital Repository (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) (submittedVersion)
  • UNC Libraries
Funders
  • National Human Genome Research Institute (R01 HG009974)
  • National Institutes of Health (R01HG009974, P01CA142538)
  • COPD Foundation
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
Keywords
multi-omics integration, missing data, detection limit, joint likelihood, maximum likelihood estimation, linear regression, generalized linear models, genetic variants, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, metabolomics, proteomics, transcriptomics, DNA methylation
MeSH terms
Data Analysis, Algorithms, Genotype, Humans, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Linear Models, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Sequence Analysis, RNA, Genomics, Proteomics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review