Drax group’s bioenergy CCS (BECCS) project
Abstract
Abstract Carbon Capture and Storage is a new technology which must be adapted to the particular situation in which it is utilised. In effect one size does not fit all. To this end, adaptation and innovation will always be at the heart of the CCUS implementation. In this article Carl Clayton, Drax Group Research and Innovation Engineer, talks to GHGS&T about the latest innovation in carbon capture at Drax Power Station in the UK.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The Drax power station in the U.K. has recently converted four of its six generating units from coal to wood pellets and operates carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies alongside power generation.
“For example, the Drax power station in the U.K. has recently converted four of its six generating units from coal to wood pellets and operates carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies alongside power generation [112].”
From Investigation of Biofuel as a Potential Renewable Energy Source (2021) · cites this paper as [112]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Investigation of Biofuel as a Potential Renewable Energy Source
Khan, M. A. H., Bonifacio, S., Clowes, J., Foulds, A., Holland, R., Matthews, J. C., Percival, C. J., & Shallcross, D. E. (2021) · Atmosphere · doi:10.3390/atmos12101289 · Cited by 140 · see citing works
“storage (CCS) technologies alongside power generation [112].”
BackgroundCO2 mitigation or removal: The optimal uses of biomass in energy system decarbonization
Patrizio, P., Fajardy, M., Bui, M., & Dowell, N. M. (2021) · iScience · doi:10.1016/j.isci.2021.102765 · Cited by 52 · see citing works
“The 2.6 GW Drax power plant (UK) was the first to demonstrate CO2 capture from biomass flue gas with a pilot-scale absorption-based facility, which captured one tCO2/day (Clayton, 2019).”
BackgroundInfluentialCross-regional drivers for CCUS deployment
Ku, A. Y., Cook, P. J., Hao, P., Li, X., Lemmon, J. P., Lockwood, T., Dowell, N. M., Singh, S., Wei, N., & Xu, W. Q. (2020) · Clean Energy · doi:10.1093/ce/zkaa008 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Li, M., Lü, Y., & Huang, M. (2020) · The Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.144318 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Coordinating the Deployment of Bioenergy with Carbon Capture and Storage
Schippers, E. J., da Costa, P., & Massol, O. (2022) · Science and Technology for Energy Transition · doi:10.2516/stet/2022018 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
“12 Clayton C. (2019) Drax group’s bioenergy CCS (BECCS) project, Greenh.”
Rodriguez, E. (2024) · Linköping studies in arts and science · doi:10.3384/9789180754873 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Rudd, J. A., Warwick, M. E. A., Taddei, M., & Wakeham, R. J. (2020) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.11973132.v1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Rudd, J. A., Warwick, M. E. A., Taddei, M., & Wakeham, R. J. (2020) · ChemRxiv · doi:10.26434/chemrxiv.11973132
- Authors
- Clayton, C.
- Corresponding author
- Clayton, Carl
- Venue
- Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2019-04
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 130-133
- ISSN
- 2152-3878 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2939318676
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4
- FWCI
- 1.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Greenhouse Gases Science and Technology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
- Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Renewable energy and sustainable power systems
- Keywords
- bioenergy with carbon capture and storage, carbon capture and storage, biomass power generation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
