Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 405

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 63 of the 63 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease and prion disease

Eikelenboom, P., Bate, C., Van Gool, W.A., Hoozemans, J.J.M., Rozemuller, J.M., Veerhuis, R., Williams, A.·2002·Glia

Abstract

Alzheimer's disease (AD) and prion disease are characterized neuropathologically by extracellular deposits of Aβ and PrP amyloid fibrils, respectively. In both disorders, these cerebral amyloid deposits are co‐localized with a broad variety of inflammation‐related proteins (complement factors, acute‐phase protein, pro‐inflammatory cytokines) and clusters of activated microglia. The present data suggest that the cerebral Aβ and PrP deposits are closely associated with a locally induced, non‐immune‐mediated chronic inflammatory response. Epidemiological studies indicate that polymorphisms of certain cytokines and acute‐phase proteins, which are associated with Aβ plaques, are genetic risk factors for AD. Transgenic mice studies have established the role of amyloid associated acute‐phase proteins in Alzheimer amyloid formation. In contrast to AD, there is a lack of evidence that cytokines and acute‐phase proteins can influence disease progression in prion disease. Clinicopathological and neuroradiological studies have shown that activation of microglia is a relatively early pathogenetic event that precedes the process of neuropil destruction in AD patients. It has also been found that the onset of microglial activation coincided in mouse models of prion disease with the earliest changes in neuronal morphology, many weeks before neuronal loss and subsequent clinical signs of disease. In the present work, we review the similarities and differences between the involvement of inflammatory mechanisms in AD and prion disease. We also discuss the concept that the demonstration of a chronic inflammatory‐like process relatively early in the pathological cascade of both diseases suggests potential therapeutic strategies to prevent or to retard these chronic neurodegenerative disorders. GLIA 40:232–239, 2002. © 2002 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.10146

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 63 references

Cited by

See all 405

Metadata

Authors
Eikelenboom, P., Bate, C., Van Gool, W. A., Hoozemans, J. J. M., Rozemuller, J. M., Veerhuis, R., & Williams, A.
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-10-04
Volume
40
Issue
2
Pages
232-239
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W2089701069
Cited by
405
References
63
FWCI
11.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease and prion disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/glia.10146
The paper
Eikelenboom, P., Bate, C., Van Gool, W. A., Hoozemans, J. J. M., Rozemuller, J. M., Veerhuis, R., & Williams, A. (2002). Neuroinflammation in Alzheimer's disease and prion disease. Glia. https://doi.org/10.1002/glia.10146

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.