Microglial EP2 is critical to neurotoxicity from activated cerebral innate immunity
Abstract
Prostaglandin (PG) E(2) acts via four functionally antagonistic E-prostanoid (EP) receptors that are expressed on multiple cell types in the nervous system; these are designated EP1-4. We showed previously that EP2 null mice are protected from CD14-dependent neuronal damage in vivo following intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Clear interpretation of this neuroprotective outcome is limited because EP2 is expressed on glia and neurons. We tested the hypothesis that microglial EP2 is required for paracrine neurotoxicity following activation of innate immunity, using primary murine microglia and neuron co-cultures. We demonstrated that microglial EP2 was necessary for lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated microglia-mediated neurotoxicity, as well as induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Genetic deletion of microglial iNOS, pharmacological suppression of COX-2 activity, or addition of exogenous superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase in the presence of EP2 also abolished neurotoxicity. This loss of paracrine neurotoxicity by EP2(-/-) microglia occurred in the absence of reduced cytokine levels. We conclude that microglial EP2 is critical to innate immunity-mediated paracrine damage to neurons involving COX-2 and iNOS. EP2 should be considered as a therapeutic target for suppression of microglial innate immunity-mediated damage in neurodegenerative diseases.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the AD brain, chronic activation of microglia is associated with inflammatory cytokines including TNFα that can substantially block the ability of microglia to remove or degrade Aβ.
“Within the AD brain, there is a chronic activation of microglia associated with inflammatory cytokines including TNF␣ that can substantially block of ability of the microglia to remove 47,49,50 or degrade A. 51,52”
From CX3CR1 Deficiency Alters Microglial Activation and Reduces Beta-Amyloid Deposition in Two Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Models (2010) · cites this paper as [47]
In vivo Aβ removal is critically dependent on microglial activation status.
“However, considerable evidence suggests that in vivo A removal is critically dependent on microglial activation status.33,44 -47”
From CX3CR1 Deficiency Alters Microglial Activation and Reduces Beta-Amyloid Deposition in Two Alzheimer's Disease Mouse Models (2010) · cites this paper as [47]
Cites
Prostanoid Receptors: Subtypes and Signaling
Breyer, R. M., Bagdassarian, C. K., Myers, S. A., & Breyer, M. D. (2001) · Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pharmtox.41.1.661 · Cited by 1,011 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lee, S., Varvel, N. H., Konerth, M. E., Xu, G., Cardona, A. E., Ransohoff, R. M., & Lamb, B. T. (2010) · The American Journal of Pathology · doi:10.2353/ajpath.2010.100265 · Cited by 539 · see citing works
Neuroinflammatory processes in Alzheimer’s disease
Heneka, M. T., O’Banion, M. K., Terwel, D., & Kummer, M. P. (2010) · Journal of Neural Transmission · doi:10.1007/s00702-010-0438-z · Cited by 433 · see citing works
Targeting innate immunity for neurodegenerative disorders of the central nervous system
Andreasson, K. I., Bachstetter, A. D., Colonna, M., Ginhoux, F., Holmes, C., Lamb, B., Landreth, G., Lee, D. C., Low, D., Lynch, M. A., et al. (2016) · Journal of Neurochemistry · doi:10.1111/jnc.13667 · Cited by 126 · see citing works
Johansson, J. U., Pradhan, S., Lokteva, L. A., Woodling, N. S., Ko, N., Brown, H. D., Wang, Q., Loh, C., Cekanaviciute, E., Buckwalter, M., et al. (2013) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.2203-13.2013 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
- Authors
- Shie, F., Montine, K. S., Breyer, R. M., & Montine, T. J.
- Affiliations
- University of Washington (US)
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
- Venue
- Glia
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2005-05-26
- Volume
- 52
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 70-77
- ISSN
- 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
- 1098-1136
- OpenAlex
- W2022841908
- Cited by
- 110
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 3.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Glia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Aging (R01AG024011)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
- Keywords
- prostaglandin E2, lipopolysaccharide, innate immunity, neurotoxicity, inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, superoxide dismutase, catalase, neuroinflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, microglia
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Cells, Cultured, Cerebral Cortex, Gliosis, Immunity, Innate, Lipopolysaccharides, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Degeneration, Neurons, Organ Culture Techniques, Dinoprostone, Microglia, Receptors, Prostaglandin E, Mice, Knockout, Inflammation Mediators, Coculture Techniques, Paracrine Communication, Mice, Cyclooxygenase 2, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II, Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP2 Subtype
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review