Cited by 110Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration MechanismsInflammatory mediators and NSAID effectsPain Mechanisms and Treatments

Microglial EP2 is critical to neurotoxicity from activated cerebral innate immunity

Shie, Feng‐Shiun, Montine, Kathleen S., Breyer, Richard M., Montine, Thomas J.·2005·Glia

Abstract

Prostaglandin (PG) E(2) acts via four functionally antagonistic E-prostanoid (EP) receptors that are expressed on multiple cell types in the nervous system; these are designated EP1-4. We showed previously that EP2 null mice are protected from CD14-dependent neuronal damage in vivo following intracerebroventricular (ICV) injection of lipopolysaccharide (LPS). Clear interpretation of this neuroprotective outcome is limited because EP2 is expressed on glia and neurons. We tested the hypothesis that microglial EP2 is required for paracrine neurotoxicity following activation of innate immunity, using primary murine microglia and neuron co-cultures. We demonstrated that microglial EP2 was necessary for lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-activated microglia-mediated neurotoxicity, as well as induction of inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS) and cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Genetic deletion of microglial iNOS, pharmacological suppression of COX-2 activity, or addition of exogenous superoxide dismutase (SOD) and catalase in the presence of EP2 also abolished neurotoxicity. This loss of paracrine neurotoxicity by EP2(-/-) microglia occurred in the absence of reduced cytokine levels. We conclude that microglial EP2 is critical to innate immunity-mediated paracrine damage to neurons involving COX-2 and iNOS. EP2 should be considered as a therapeutic target for suppression of microglial innate immunity-mediated damage in neurodegenerative diseases.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/glia.20220

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shie, F., Montine, K. S., Breyer, R. M., & Montine, T. J.
Affiliations
  • University of Washington (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Venue
Glia
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-05-26
Volume
52
Issue
1
Pages
70-77
ISSN
  • 0894-1491 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1136
OpenAlex
W2022841908
Cited by
110
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
3.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Glia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Aging (R01AG024011)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neuroinflammation and Neurodegeneration Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Inflammatory mediators and NSAID effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Keywords
prostaglandin E2, lipopolysaccharide, innate immunity, neurotoxicity, inducible nitric oxide synthase, cyclooxygenase-2, superoxide dismutase, catalase, neuroinflammation, neurodegenerative diseases, microglia
MeSH terms
Animals, Cells, Cultured, Cerebral Cortex, Gliosis, Immunity, Innate, Lipopolysaccharides, Mice, Inbred BALB C, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Nerve Degeneration, Neurons, Organ Culture Techniques, Dinoprostone, Microglia, Receptors, Prostaglandin E, Mice, Knockout, Inflammation Mediators, Coculture Techniques, Paracrine Communication, Mice, Cyclooxygenase 2, Nitric Oxide Synthase Type II, Receptors, Prostaglandin E, EP2 Subtype

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review