Cited by 50Mental Health Treatment and AccessPharmaceutical Practices and Patient OutcomesTreatment of Major Depression

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antidepressant drug prescribing among elderly subjects: a population-based study

Percudani, Mauro, Barbui, Corrado, Fortino, Ida, Petrovich, Lorenzo·2005·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The patterns of antidepressant drug prescribing have rarely been studied in large and geographically defined populations of elderly subjects. In the present study we examined the prevalence and distribution of antidepressant prescribing in Lombardy, a northern Italy region with more than one and a half million elderly inhabitants. METHODS: We used the Regional Administrative Database of Lombardy. This database includes all prescriptions reimbursed by the National Health System in the population living in this region. All antidepressant prescriptions dispensed to subjects aged 65 years or above during 2001 were extracted and prevalence data calculated by dividing antidepressant users by the total number of male and female residents in each age group. RESULTS: During the 12 months surveyed 153,706 subjects were dispensed one or more prescriptions of antidepressants, yielding a prevalence of use of 9.49 subjects per 100 inhabitants (95% confidence interval 9.44, 9.53). Although the proportion of chronic users slightly decreased with age, more than 35% of those older that 85 years were moderate or chronic antidepressant users. General practitioners issued the majority of antidepressant prescriptions, and most antidepressant users were also dispensed agents for medical disorders. CONCLUSIONS: The very high rates of antidepressant drug prescribing detected in late life suggest the need of characterising these subjects in terms of medical and psychiatric characteristics, needs and quality of life. It also suggests the need for pragmatic clinical trials, carried out in the general practice, with the aim of assessing whether antidepressants are effective in these conditions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.1259

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Percudani, M., Barbui, C., Fortino, I., & Petrovich, L.
Affiliations
  • Regione Lombardia (IT)
  • University of Verona (IT)
Corresponding author
Percudani, Mauro
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2005-01-19
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
113-118
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2119817792
Cited by
50
References
18
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
10.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Treatment of Major Depression
Keywords
antidepressant prescribing, older adults, general practitioners, prescribing patterns, Lombardy, geriatric depression
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antidepressive Agents, Mental Disorders, Humans, Italy, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Quality of Life, Prevalence, Confidence Intervals, Databases, Factual

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review