The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A six‐month double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer's disease–– rivastigmine patch versus capsule
Open accessAbstract
Objectives: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a novel rivastigmine transdermal patch with conventional rivastigmine capsules and placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: In this 24‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, double‐dummy, placebo‐ and active‐controlled trial, patients with probable AD were randomized to one of four treatment groups: 12 mg/day rivastigmine capsules; 10 cm 2 (9.5 mg/24 h) rivastigmine patch; 20 cm 2 (17.4 mg/24 h) rivastigmine patch; or placebo. Primary efficacy measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive subscale (ADAS‐Cog) and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study––Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS‐CGIC). Results: One thousand one hundred and ninety five AD patients from 21 countries participated in the study. Treatment differences (vs placebo) on the ADAS‐Cog at Week 24 in 10 cm 2 patch, 20 cm 2 patch and capsule groups were 1.6 (p = 0.005), 2.6 (p < 0.001) and 1.6 (p = 0.003). Treatment differences on the ADCS‐CGIC were 0.3 (p = 0.01), 0.2 (p = 0.054) and 0.3 (p = 0.009). Comparison between the 10 cm 2 patch and the capsule revealed non‐inferiority. Rates of nausea in the 10 cm 2 patch and capsule groups were 7.2% and 23.1%, respectively; rates of vomiting were 6.2% and 17.0%, respectively. Moderate or severe skin irritation occurred in ≤10% patients across the four patch sizes (5, 10, 15 and 20 cm 2). Conclusions: The target dose of 10 cm 2 rivastigmine patch provides efficacy similar to the highest doses of capsules with a superior tolerability profile. The transdermal patch with rivastigmine may offer convenience important to many caregivers and patients. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2022) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425787 · Cited by 23,476
The Neuropsychiatric Inventory: Comprehensive assessment of psychopathology in dementia
Cummings, J. L., Mega, M., Gray, K., Rosenberg-Thompson, S., Carusi, D. A., & Gornbein, J. (1994) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.44.12.2308 · Cited by 7,568 · cited 2×
“, 1997); Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) for behavior and psychiatric symptoms (Cummings et al., 1994); MMSE (Folstein et al.”
BackgroundSelf-citationKnopman, D. S., DeKosky, S. T., Cummings, J. L., Chui, H., Corey–Bloom, J., Relkin, N., Small, G. W., Miller, B., & Stevens, J. C. (2001) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.56.9.1143 · Cited by 1,410
Self-citationFratiglioni, L., Grut, M., Forsell, Y., Viitanen, M., Grafström, M., Holmen, K., Ericsson, K., Bäckman, L., Ahlbom, A., & Winblad, B. (1991) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.41.12.1886 · Cited by 525
Self-citationClinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of cholinesterase inhibitors
Jann, M. W., Shirley, K. L., & Small, G. W. (2002) · Clinical Pharmacokinetics · doi:10.2165/00003088-200241100-00003 · Cited by 365
Cited by
Dementia prevention, intervention, and care
Livingston, G., Sommerlad, A., Orgeta, V., Costafreda, S. G., Huntley, J., Ames, D., Ballard, C., Banerjee, S., Burns, A., Cohen-Mansfield, J., et al. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(17)31363-6 · Cited by 6,072
Rivastigmine for Alzheimer’s disease.
Birks, J. S., Chong, L.-Y., & Grimley Evans, J. (2015) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd001191.pub4 · Cited by 534
Tan, C.-C., Yu, J.-T., Wang, H.-F., Tan, M.-S., Meng, X.-F., Wang, C., Jiang, T., Zhu, X.-C., & Tan, L. (2014) · Journal of Alzheimer s Disease · doi:10.3233/jad-132690 · Cited by 484
A review of butyrylcholinesterase as a therapeutic target in the treatment of Alzheimer’s disease
Nordberg, A., Ballard, C., Bullock, R., Darreh-Shori, T., & Somogyi, M. (2013) · The Primary Care Companion For CNS Disorders · doi:10.4088/pcc.12r01412 · Cited by 323
Henderson, E. J., Lord, S. R., Brodie, M. A., Gaunt, D. M., Lawrence, A. D., Close, J. C. T., Whone, A. L., & Ben-Shlomo, Y. (2016) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(15)00389-0 · Cited by 304
Metadata
- Authors
- Winblad, B., Cummings, J., Andreasen, N., Grossberg, G., Onofrj, M., Sadowsky, C., Zechner, S., Nagel, J., & Lane, R.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-03-22
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 456-467
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2052011640
- Cited by
- 286
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 15.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A six‐month double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer's disease–– rivastigmine patch versus capsule. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gps.1788
- The paper
- Winblad, B., Cummings, J., Andreasen, N., Grossberg, G., Onofrj, M., Sadowsky, C., Zechner, S., Nagel, J., & Lane, R. (2007). A six‐month double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer's disease–– rivastigmine patch versus capsule. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1788
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.