Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 286

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A six‐month double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer's disease–– rivastigmine patch versus capsule

Open access
Winblad, Bengt, Cummings, Jeffrey, Andreasen, Niels, Grossberg, George, Onofrj, Marco, Sadowsky, Carl, Zechner, Stefanie, Nagel, Jennifer, Lane, Roger·2007·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy, safety and tolerability of a novel rivastigmine transdermal patch with conventional rivastigmine capsules and placebo in patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Methods: In this 24‐week, multicenter, double‐blind, double‐dummy, placebo‐ and active‐controlled trial, patients with probable AD were randomized to one of four treatment groups: 12 mg/day rivastigmine capsules; 10 cm 2 (9.5 mg/24 h) rivastigmine patch; 20 cm 2 (17.4 mg/24 h) rivastigmine patch; or placebo. Primary efficacy measures were the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale—Cognitive subscale (ADAS‐Cog) and Alzheimer's Disease Cooperative Study––Clinical Global Impression of Change (ADCS‐CGIC). Results: One thousand one hundred and ninety five AD patients from 21 countries participated in the study. Treatment differences (vs placebo) on the ADAS‐Cog at Week 24 in 10 cm 2 patch, 20 cm 2 patch and capsule groups were 1.6 (p = 0.005), 2.6 (p < 0.001) and 1.6 (p = 0.003). Treatment differences on the ADCS‐CGIC were 0.3 (p = 0.01), 0.2 (p = 0.054) and 0.3 (p = 0.009). Comparison between the 10 cm 2 patch and the capsule revealed non‐inferiority. Rates of nausea in the 10 cm 2 patch and capsule groups were 7.2% and 23.1%, respectively; rates of vomiting were 6.2% and 17.0%, respectively. Moderate or severe skin irritation occurred in ≤10% patients across the four patch sizes (5, 10, 15 and 20 cm 2). Conclusions: The target dose of 10 cm 2 rivastigmine patch provides efficacy similar to the highest doses of capsules with a superior tolerability profile. The transdermal patch with rivastigmine may offer convenience important to many caregivers and patients. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.1788

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 286

Metadata

Authors
Winblad, B., Cummings, J., Andreasen, N., Grossberg, G., Onofrj, M., Sadowsky, C., Zechner, S., Nagel, J., & Lane, R.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2007-03-22
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
456-467
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2052011640
Cited by
286
References
5
FWCI
15.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A six‐month double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer's disease–– rivastigmine patch versus capsule. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gps.1788
The paper
Winblad, B., Cummings, J., Andreasen, N., Grossberg, G., Onofrj, M., Sadowsky, C., Zechner, S., Nagel, J., & Lane, R. (2007). A six‐month double‐blind, randomized, placebo‐controlled study of a transdermal patch in Alzheimer's disease–– rivastigmine patch versus capsule. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.1788

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.