The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Psychological resilience in young and older adults
Abstract
Background: The goal of the current study was to investigate psychological resilience in the older adults (>64 years) compared with that of the young ones (<26 years). Methods: Questionnaire measures of depression, hopelessness, general health and resilience were administered to the participants. The resilience measure comprised three sub‐scales of social support, emotional regulation and problem solving. Results: The older adults were the more resilient group especially with respect to emotional regulation ability and problem solving. The young ones had more resilience related to social support. Poor perceptions of general health and low energy levels predicted low levels of resilience regardless of age. Low hopelessness scores also predicted greater resilience in both groups. Experiencing higher levels of mental illness and physical dysfunction predicted high resilience scores especially for the social support resilience scale in the older adults. The negative effects of depression on resilience related to emotional regulation were countered by low hopelessness but only in the young adults. Conclusions: These results highlight the importance of maintaining resilience‐related coping skills in both young and older adults but indicate that different psychological processes underlie resilience across the lifespan. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
Development and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report
Yesavage, J. A., Brink, T. L., Rose, T. L., Lum, O., Huang, V., Adey, M., & Leirer, V. O. (1982) · Journal of Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1016/0022-3956(82)90033-4 · Cited by 15,025
Ordinary magic: Resilience processes in development.
Masten, A. S. (2001) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.56.3.227 · Cited by 8,497 · cited 1×
“Psychological resilience is considered to be a protective mechanism that operates in the face of negative stressors (Masten, 2001; Bonanno, 2004).”
Bonanno, G. A. (2004) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.59.1.20 · Cited by 6,851
The measurement of pessimism: the hopelessness scale
Beck, A. T., Weissman, A., Lester, D., & Trexler, L. (1974) · Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0037562 · Cited by 5,494
Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P., & Barron, K. E. (2004) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.51.1.115 · Cited by 4,037 · cited 1×
“Predictors of resilience scores were analysed using hierarchical multiple regression analysis for which all predictor variables were standardised before entry into the model to avoid multi‐colinearity effect (Frazier et al., 2004).”
MethodFiske, A., Wetherell, J. L., & Gatz, M. (2009) · Annual Review of Clinical Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.032408.153621 · Cited by 2,353
Nygren, B., Aléx, L., Jonsén, E., Gustafson, Y., Norberg, A., & Lundman, B. (2005) · Aging & Mental Health · doi:10.1080/1360500114415 · Cited by 589
Netuveli, G., & Blane, D. (2008) · British Medical Bulletin · doi:10.1093/bmb/ldn003 · Cited by 497
Cited by
Angelakis, I., Austin, J. L., & Gooding, P. (2020) · JAMA Network Open · doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12563 · Cited by 385
Self-citationHou, T., Zhang, T., Cai, W., Song, X., Chen, A., Deng, G., & Ni, C. (2020) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0233831 · Cited by 287
Thomas, M. L., Kaufmann, C. N., Palmer, B. W., Depp, C. A., Martin, A. S., Glorioso, D. K., Thompson, W. K., & Jeste, D. V. (2016) · The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry · doi:10.4088/jcp.16m10671 · Cited by 225
Resilience, age, and perceived symptoms in persons with long-term physical disabilities
Terrill, A. L., Molton, I. R., Ehde, D. M., Amtmann, D., Bombardier, C. H., Smith, A. E., & Jensen, M. P. (2016) · Journal of Health Psychology · doi:10.1177/1359105314532973 · Cited by 142
Intrinsic Capacity as a Determinant of Physical Resilience in Older Adults
Chhetri, J. K., Xue, Q.-L., Ma, L., Chan, P., & Varadhan, R. (2021) · The Journal of nutrition, health and aging · doi:10.1007/s12603-021-1629-z · Cited by 118
Metadata
- Authors
- Gooding, P. A., Hurst, A., Johnson, J., & Tarrier, N.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2011-04-06
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 262-270
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W1785250346
- Cited by
- 468
- References
- 30
- FWCI
- 8.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Psychological resilience in young and older adults. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gps.2712
- The paper
- Gooding, P. A., Hurst, A., Johnson, J., & Tarrier, N. (2012). Psychological resilience in young and older adults. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.2712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
