Cited by 118Frailty in Older AdultsAging, Health, and DisabilityAging and Gerontology Research

Intrinsic Capacity as a Determinant of Physical Resilience in Older Adults

Open access
Chhetri, Jagadish K., Xue, Q.-L., Ma, L., Chan, P., Varadhan, Ravi·2021·The Journal of nutrition, health and aging

Abstract

The traditional disease-oriented model of healthcare is inadequate to address the needs of the older population. Greater attention should be given to strategies that promote healthy aging. Recently proposed constructs of intrinsic capacity (IC) and physical resilience (PR) hold great potential to reshape geriatric medicine and aging research. These constructs accentuate the positive health attributes of older people in contrast to the popular frailty construct that is centered on functional deficits. IC was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a composite of all the physical and mental capacities. WHO has emphasized enhancement of IC throughout the life course so as to maintain functional ability in old age. PR, recently highlighted by the National Institute on Aging, is the ability to successfully cope with stressors. High levels of resilience can result in desirable clinical and functional outcomes after stressors. Therefore, it is important to understand the underlying physiology of PR and the risk factors contributing to diminished PR. The main goal of this article is to explore the potential relationship between IC and PR. Based on a classical theory of aging, we postulate that IC is a determinant of PR and is also a high-level integrative measure of physiologic reserve which is the fundamental factor underlying one's ability to withstand stressors. A major implication of our postulates is that even though IC is only one of the many determinants of PR, it could serve as an important intervenable target for enhancing resilience in older adults.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s12603-021-1629-z

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chhetri, J. K., Xue, Q.-L., Ma, L., Chan, P., & Varadhan, R.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Capital Medical University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Chhetri, Jagadish K.
  • Varadhan, Ravi
Venue
The Journal of nutrition, health and aging
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-09
Volume
25
Issue
8
Pages
1006-1011
ISSN
1279-7707 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154807171
Cited by
118
References
30
Citations by year
2026: 28 · 2025: 35 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 4
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The journal of nutrition health & aging (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Institute on Aging (UH3AG056933, UH2AG056933, P30AG021334)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
Keywords
intrinsic capacity, physical resilience, older adults, healthy aging, frailty, physiological reserve, stress coping, theories of aging, geriatrics, resilience interventions
MeSH terms
Frailty, Healthy Aging, Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Aged, Aging, Humans

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review