Cited by 38Mindfulness and Compassion InterventionsDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchNursing care and research

Feasibility of Central Meditation and Imagery Therapy for dementia caregivers

Open access
Jain, Felipe A., Nazarian, Nora, Lavretsky, Helen·2014·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objectives: Family dementia caregivers are at high risk of depression and burnout. We assessed the feasibility of Central Meditation and Imagery Therapy for Caregivers (CMIT‐C), a novel 8‐week group meditation and guided imagery group therapy program, for dementia caregivers reporting stress because of caregiving responsibilities. Methods: Twelve family dementia caregivers enrolled in CMIT‐C. Primary outcomes included depression and anxiety, and secondary outcomes included insomnia, quality of life, and mindfulness. Changes over the study and 3 month follow‐up were analyzed with non‐parametric related samples tests. Correlations of feeling state changes from meditation diaries at 1 week were made with symptom changes post meditation training. Results: Ten participants completed the study. Completers came to an average of 7 ± 1 sessions out of a possible 8 sessions, and turned in home practice logs of 90 ± 10% of the time. Anxiety, depression, and insomnia symptoms decreased, and mindfulness ratings improved with large effects (all p < 0.05 and Cohen's d ≥ 0.7). Gains were stable at 3 months. Early response during the first week of meditation practice was associated with subsequent home meditation practice, anxiety change at 8 weeks, and endpoint satisfaction with CMIT‐C. Conclusions: Central Meditation and Imagery Therapy for Caregivers is a feasible intervention for dementia caregivers. Results suggest that this therapeutic technique can reduce symptoms of anxiety, depression, and insomnia, and increase levels of mindfulness. Early response to meditation practice predicted those with the greatest short‐term benefits, and this may inform future studies of meditation. Larger controlled efficacy studies of CMIT‐C for dementia caregivers are warranted. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.4076

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Caring for an individual with dementia has been characterized as a severe, long-term chronic stressor.

    “Caring for an individual with dementia has been characterized as a severe, long-term chronic stressor [24].”

    From A novel two-day intervention reduces stress in caregivers of persons with dementia (2018) · cites this paper as [24]

    The Introduction describes dementia caregiving as involving chronic stressors and says caregivers may experience severe stress when they perceive those stressors as overwhelming. It does not characterize caregiving as uniformly severe, and its discussion of chronic stressors does not explicitly establish the claimed long-term duration. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Prior studies suggest that mindfulness effectively reduces caregiver perceived stress and depression.

    “Prior studies suggest that mindfulness effectively reduces caregiver perceived stress and depression [24], [27], [28]”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Olivelle P 1996 Upaniṣads Oxford University Press Oxford; New York
  2. Walsh RN 1982 A Model for Viewing Meditation Research The Journal of Transpersonal Psychology 14 69 84

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jain, F. A., Nazarian, N., & Lavretsky, H.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Jain, Felipe A.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-01-29
Volume
29
Issue
8
Pages
870-876
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W1822908048
Cited by
38
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.36
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH017140)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Nursing care and research
Keywords
dementia caregivers, meditation, guided imagery, group therapy, caregiver depression, caregiver anxiety, insomnia, mindfulness, caregiver stress, feasibility, quality of life
MeSH terms
Aged, Anxiety, Dementia, Depression, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Sleep Initiation and Maintenance Disorders, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Caregivers, Patient Satisfaction, Imagery, Psychotherapy, Meditation, Qualitative Research, Mindfulness

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review