Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 160

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium following hip fracture repair: a systematic review

Open access
Oh, Esther S., Li, Meng, Fafowora, Tolulope M., Inouye, Sharon K., Chen, Cathy H., Rosman, Lori M., Lyketsos, Constantine G., Sieber, Frederick E., Puhan, Milo A.·2015·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: Systematically identify preoperative clinical risk factors for incident postoperative delirium in individuals undergoing hip fracture repair in order to guide clinicians in identifying high risk patients at admission. Methods: This is a systematic review of prospective observational studies with estimation of association between preoperative risk factors and incident postoperative delirium in multivariate models. Electronic searches were conducted in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, Proquest Dissertations and Theses, and WorldCatDissertations. Hand searches were conducted in selected journals and their supplements. Results: Search yielded 6380 titles and abstracts from electronic databases and 72 titles from hand searches, and 10 studies met inclusion criteria. The following risk factors were significant in bivariate models: cognitive impairment, age, gender, institutionalization, functional impairment, body mass index (BMI), albumin, comorbidities, American Society of Anesthesiologist classification, acute medical conditions, polypharmacy, and vision impairment. Among all of these risk factors, cognitive impairment most consistently remained statistically significant after adjusting for other risk factors in multivariate models, followed by BMI/albumin and multiple comorbidities. Conclusion: In our systematic review, cognitive impairment was one of the strongest preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium after hip fracture surgery. Preoperative cognitive assessment may be one of the most useful methods of identifying those who are at high risk for postoperative delirium and prioritizing delivery of delirium prevention measures. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.4233

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 160

Metadata

Authors
Oh, E. S., Li, M., Fafowora, T. M., Inouye, S. K., Chen, C. H., Rosman, L. M., Lyketsos, C. G., Sieber, F. E., & Puhan, M. A.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2014-12-11
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
900-910
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W1569206101
Cited by
160
References
4
FWCI
2.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium following hip fracture repair: a systematic review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gps.4233
The paper
Oh, E. S., Li, M., Fafowora, T. M., Inouye, S. K., Chen, C. H., Rosman, L. M., Lyketsos, C. G., Sieber, F. E., & Puhan, M. A. (2015). Preoperative risk factors for postoperative delirium following hip fracture repair: a systematic review. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.4233

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.