Cited by 31Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Community validation of the IDEA study cognitive screen in rural Tanzania: Community validation of the IDEA cognitive screen

Open access
Gray, William K., Paddick, Stella Maria, Collingwood, Cecilia, Kisoli, Aloyce, Mbowe, Godfrey, Mkenda, Sarah, Lissu, Carolyn, Rogathi, Jane +6 more·2016·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The dementia diagnosis gap in sub-Saharan Africa (SSA) is large, partly because of difficulties in screening for cognitive impairment in the community. As part of the Identification and Intervention for Dementia in Elderly Africans (IDEA) study, we aimed to validate the IDEA cognitive screen in a community-based sample in rural Tanzania METHODS: Study participants were recruited from people who attended screening days held in villages within the rural Hai district of Tanzania. Criterion validity was assessed against the gold standard clinical dementia diagnosis using DSM-IV criteria. Construct validity was assessed against, age, education, sex and grip strength and instrumental activities of daily living (IADLs). Internal consistency and floor and ceiling effects were also examined. RESULTS: During community screening, the IDEA cognitive screen had high criterion validity, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.855 (95% CI 0.794 to 0.915). Higher scores on the screen were significantly correlated with lower age, male sex, having attended school, better grip strength and improved performance in activities of daily living. Factor analysis revealed a single factor with an eigenvalue greater than one, although internal consistency was only moderate (Cronbach's alpha = 0.534). CONCLUSIONS: The IDEA cognitive screen had high criterion and construct validity and is suitable for use as a cognitive screening instrument in a community setting in SSA. Only moderate internal consistency may partly reflect the multi-domain nature of dementia as diagnosed clinically. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.4415

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gray, W. K., Paddick, S. M., Collingwood, C., Kisoli, A., Mbowe, G., Mkenda, S., Lissu, C., Rogathi, J., Kissima, J., Walker, R. W., Mushi, D., Chaote, P., Ogunniyi, A., & Dotchin, C. L.
Affiliations
  • North Tyneside General Hospital (GB)
  • Newcastle University (GB)
  • Hai District Medical Office; Boma'ngombe, Kilimanjaro; Tanzania
  • Kilimanjaro Christian Medical Centre (TZ)
  • University College Hospital, Ibadan (NG)
Corresponding author
Gray, William K.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2016-02-02
Volume
31
Issue
11
Pages
1199-1207
ISSN
0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2253855097
Cited by
31
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3
FWCI
2.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
by Grand Challenges Canada (0086-04)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
dementia screening, cognitive impairment, sub-Saharan Africa, rural Tanzania, criterion validity, construct validity, internal consistency, grip strength, instrumental activities of daily living, community-based screening, older adults
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Cognition Disorders, Dementia, Female, Humans, Male, Mass Screening, ROC Curve, Rural Population, Tanzania, Reproducibility of Results, Rural Health Services, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review