Cited by 47Dementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHistorical and Modern Theater StudiesPsychological Testing and Assessment

Current approaches to dementia screening and case finding in low‐ and middle‐income countries: Research update and recommendations

Open access
Magklara, Eleni, Stephan, Blossom C.M., Robinson, Louise·2019·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Approximately 47 million people have dementia worldwide, with this figure, it is expected to almost triple by 2050. Most people with dementia (approximately two‐thirds) live in low‐ and middle‐income countries (LMICs). This presents a significant challenge for such countries that often have limited financial resources and less well‐developed health and social care systems. In the absence of a cure, reducing the future costs of dementia care and burden of disease may be best achieved by a greater emphasis on (1) more timely diagnosis with earlier intervention to maintain functional independence and (2) undertaking “screening” in groups at high risk of developing dementia, case finding, and using brief cognitive assessment instruments. In clinical settings, a wide range of instruments for dementia screening and diagnosis are currently available; however, few cognitive assessment tools have been developed specifically for clinical use within LMIC settings. Screening for dementia and cognitive impairment in LMICs largely relies on tools adapted from high‐income countries (HICs); these often lack validation in these settings leading to education, literacy, and cultural biases. Research is urgently needed to develop cognitive assessment tools and dementia diagnostic approaches that are appropriate and feasible for clinical use in LMIC settings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.4969

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. [29]29. Shim YS, Yang DW, Kim H-J, Park YH, Kim SY. Characteristic differ- ences in the mini-mental state examination used in Asian countries. BMC Neurol. 2017;17(1):141.
  2. [35]35. Werner P, Heinik J, Lin R, Bleich A. 'Yes' ifs, ands or buts: examining performance and correlates of the repetition task in the Mini-Mental State Examination. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 1999;14(9):719-725.
  3. [46]46. Hall KS, Hendrie H, Brittain HM. The development of a dementia screening interview in two distinct languages. Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 1993;3:1-28.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Magklara, E., Stephan, B. C. M., & Robinson, L.
Affiliations
Newcastle University (GB)
Corresponding author
Robinson, Louise
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-09-24
Volume
34
Issue
1
Pages
3-7
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2893302213
Cited by
47
References
53
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
2.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
NIHR Global Health Research Group on Dementia Prevention and Enhanced Care (DePEC), Newcastle University (16/137/62)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical and Modern Theater Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Psychological Testing and Assessment
Keywords
dementia screening, case finding, low- and middle-income countries, cognitive assessment tools, dementia diagnosis, cognitive impairment, cross-cultural adaptation, tool validation, early diagnosis
MeSH terms
Dementia, Developing Countries, Humans, Mass Screening, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychometrics, Cognitive Dysfunction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review