Cited by 65Physical Activity and HealthContext-Aware Activity Recognition SystemsTechnology Use by Older Adults

Acceptability and feasibility of wearing activity monitors in community-dwelling older adults with dementia

Open access
Farina, Nicolas, Sherlock, Gina, Thomas, Serena, Lowry, Ruth G., Banerjee, Sube·2019·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Measuring physical activity is complicated particularly in people with dementia, where activity levels are low and subjective measures are susceptible to inaccurate recall. Activity monitors are increasingly being used within research; however, it is unclear how people with dementia view wearing such devices and what aspects of the device effect wear time. The aim of the study was to evaluate the acceptability and feasibility of people with dementia wearing activity monitors. METHODS: Twenty-six, community-dwelling, people with mild dementia were asked to wear an activity monitor (GENEactiv Original) over a 1-month period. Perceptions of the device were measured using the Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST) 2.0, alongside qualitative interviews. Device diary and activity monitor data were used to assess compliance. RESULTS: Participants tended to find wearing the activity monitors acceptable, with only three participants (12%) withdrawing prior to the study end date. Participants were generally satisfied with wearing the devices as measured by the QUEST (Mdn = 4.4, IQR = 1.1). Four themes were identified that influenced perceptions of wearing the device: external influences, design, routine, and perceived benefits. DISCUSSION: Asking people with dementia to wear a wrist-worn activity monitor for prolonged periods appears to be both feasible and acceptable. Researchers need to consider the needs and preferences of the sample population prior to selecting activity monitors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.5064

Cites

35 of 35 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Part of this paper’s reference list could not be split into single entries.

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Farina, N., Sherlock, G., Thomas, S., Lowry, R. G., & Banerjee, S.
Affiliations
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • University of Chichester (GB)
Corresponding author
Farina, Nicolas
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2019-02-20
Volume
34
Issue
4
Pages
617-624
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W2914275304
Cited by
65
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • ChiPrints (University of Chichester) (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) (acceptedVersion)
  • Sussex Research Online (University of Sussex) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Centre for Dementia Studies, Brighton and Sussex Medical School
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Technology Use by Older Adults
Keywords
dementia, wearable activity trackers, physical activity measurement, wearable devices, acceptability, feasibility, community-dwelling older adults, device compliance, user satisfaction, assistive technology, GENEActiv, device design
MeSH terms
Aged, Dementia, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Personal Satisfaction, Quebec, Exercise, Independent Living, Accelerometry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review