Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 259

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 61 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and apathy symptoms across dementia stages: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

Open access
Leung, Dara K.Y., Chan, Wai Chi, Spector, Aimee, Wong, Gloria H.Y.·2021·International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to resolve inconsistency in reported prevalence of affective symptoms by dementia stage. Methods/Design: We conducted a meta‐analysis of studies with data on dementia stage and prevalence of depression, anxiety, or apathy assessed using validated tools. We performed random‐effects meta‐analysis and subgroup analysis on symptom prevalence by dementia stage, according to CDR. Results: The meta‐analysis included 5897 people with dementia from 20 studies. Prevalence rates of depression in mild, moderate, and severe dementia were 38% (95% CI 32%–45%), 41% (95% CI 33%–49%), and 37% (95% CI 17%–56%) respectively. The corresponding prevalence for anxiety was 38% (95% CI 31%–45%), 41% (95% CI 31%–52%), and 37% (95% CI −8%–82%); and 54% (95% CI 45%–62%), 59% (95% CI 44%–73%), and 43% (95% CI 10%–75%) for apathy. The prevalence of depression, anxiety, and apathy did not differ with regard to dementia stage and type. The prevalence of depression in Alzheimer's disease (AD) was significantly lower when it was assessed using diagnostic criteria compared to screening tools. The prevalence of depression in AD was lowest in America, while anxiety in vascular dementia was higher in Europe than Asia. Conclusions: Depression, anxiety, and apathy symptoms are highly prevalent across dementia stages. There is no evidence of any changes in prevalence of affective symptom as the illness progresses. Evaluation methods and cultural difference may explain some of the variance, suggesting further investigation of factors that may influence the report of symptoms, such as carer psychosocial characteristics, and more cross‐cultural studies are needed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/gps.5556

Cites

61 of 61 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Cited by

See all 259

Metadata

Authors
Leung, D. K. Y., Chan, W. C., Spector, A., & Wong, G. H. Y.
Venue
International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-05-04
Volume
36
Issue
9
Pages
1330-1344
ISSN
  • 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1166
OpenAlex
W3158474553
Cited by
259
References
61
FWCI
8.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and apathy symptoms across dementia stages: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/gps.5556
The paper
Leung, D. K. Y., Chan, W. C., Spector, A., & Wong, G. H. Y. (2021). Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and apathy symptoms across dementia stages: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1002/gps.5556

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.