The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Standard measures of executive function in predicting instrumental activities of daily living in older adults
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to examine the ability of specific, commonly used neuropsychological tests of executive function to predict functional status among a group of elderly subjects. Methods: Fifty study participants underwent a brief neuropsychological evaluation of executive functions and assessment of instrumental activities of daily living (IADL). Results: A multiple stepwise regression analysis indicated that executive function tests accounted for 54% of the variance in functional status. An examination of the standardized regression coefficients revealed that Trail Making Test‐Part B and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test were the only two of the five executive function tests that significantly predicted functional status. These executive function measures contributed significantly to the prediction of functional status even after statistically controlling for age, sex, and education. Conclusion: Thus, the common clinical measures of executive function are useful in predicting functional status in older adults. Copyright © 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The ecological validity of tests of executive function
BURGESS, P. W., ALDERMAN, N., EVANS, J., EMSLIE, H., & WILSON, B. A. (1998) · Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society · doi:10.1017/s1355617798466037 · Cited by 932
Grigsby, J., Kaye, K., Baxter, J., Shetterly, S. M., & Hamman, R. F. (1998) · Journal of the American Geriatrics Society · doi:10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb01075.x · Cited by 288
Cited by
Karr, J. E., Areshenkoff, C. N., Rast, P., Hofer, S. M., Iverson, G. L., & Garcia-Barrera, M. A. (2018) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/bul0000160 · Cited by 637
JEFFERSON, A., PAUL, R., OZONOFF, A., & COHEN, R. (2006) · Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology · doi:10.1016/j.acn.2006.03.007 · Cited by 248
Activities of daily living in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease
Mioshi, E., Kipps, C. M., Dawson, K., Mitchell, J., Graham, A., & Hodges, J. R. (2007) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/01.wnl.0000264897.13722.53 · Cited by 188
Man, D. W. K., Chung, J. C. C., & Lee, G. Y. Y. (2012) · International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/gps.2746 · Cited by 136
Davids, R. C. D., Groen, Y., Berg, I. J., Tucha, O. M., & van Balkom, I. D. C. (2016) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/s10803-016-2831-4 · Cited by 75
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell‐McGinty, S., Podell, K., Franzen, M., Baird, A. D., & Williams, M. J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 828-834
- ISSN
- 0885-6230 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-1166
- OpenAlex
- W2069054446
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 4.04
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
