Cited by 90Climate variability and modelsFlood Risk Assessment and ManagementHydrology and Watershed Management Studies

A quick look at the 2012 record flood in the Amazon Basin.

Open access
Satyamurty, Prakki, da Costa, Claudia Priscila Wanzeler, Manzi, Antonio Ocimar, Candido, Luiz Antonio·2013·Geophysical Research Letters

Abstract

Abstract The water level at the Manaus Port on the Negro River reached its record value of 29.97 m on 29 May 2012. This is higher than the previous record in the year 2009 by 20 cm. The rise of the level from November 2011 till the record maximum is the highest in the past several decades. A cooler South Atlantic and a normal or slightly warmer North Atlantic were associated with a record flood in the Amazon Basin in 2012. The seasonal atmospheric moisture convergence and the precipitation over the Amazon Basin are well correlated. During the period October 2011 through May 2012 the moisture‐flux convergence was 38% more intense than climatology. The rainfall equivalence of this excess moisture convergence is about 2.5 mm d–1 in the western Amazon Basin and 1.8 mm d–1 in the whole Amazon Basin.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/grl.50245

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Since the 1970s there has been an upward trend in the year-to-year variability of Amazon River discharge, following a period with no trend during 1904 through the 1960s.

    “Since the 1970s there has been an upward trend in the year-to-year variability of Amazon River discharge, following a period with no trend during 1904 through the 1960’s (Satyamurty et al., 2013;Barichivich et al., 2018).”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Satyamurty et al., 2013

    Section 3.2, paragraphs 13–14, reports that the annual range of Negro River water levels at Manaus increased after 1970, with no significant long-range trend from 1904 to the late 1960s. That supports the stated timing, but the measured trend is in the range between high and low water levels, not year-to-year variability of Amazon River discharge. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The Amazon floods of 2009 and 2012 were the largest going back several decades and left hundreds of thousands homeless.

    “At the other extreme, the Amazon floods of 2009 and 2012 were the largest going back several decades (Satyamurty et al., 2013;Filizola et al., 2014) and left hundreds of thousands homeless.”

    From The tropical atlantic observing system (2019) · cites this paper as Satyamurty et al., 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. Marengo, J. A. (2004), Interdecadal variability and trends of rainfall across the Amazon Basin, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 78, 79-96. doi:10.1007/ s00704-004-0045-8. · DOI
  2. Marengo, J. A., J. Tomasella, W. R. Soares, L. M. Alves, and C. A. Nobre (2011), Extreme climatic events in the Amazon basin: Climatological and hydrological context of recent floods, Theor. Appl. Climatol., 107(1-2), 73-85, doi:10.1007/s00704-011-0465-1. · DOI
  3. Satyamurty, P., C. P. Wanzeler da Costa, and A. O. Manzi (2012), Moisture source for the Amazon Basin: A study of contrasting years, Theor. Appl. Climatol., doi:10.1007/s00704-12-0637-7. · DOI
  4. Yoon, J.-H., and N. Zeng (2009), An Atlantic influence on Amazon rainfall, Clim. Dyn., doi:10.1007/s00382-009-0551-6. · DOI
  5. Zeng, N., J.-H. Yoon, J. A. Marengo, A. Subramaniam, C. A. Nobre, A. Mariotti, and J. D. Neelin (2008), Causes and impacts of the 2005 Amazon drought, Environ. Res. Letters, doi:10.1088/1748-9326/3/1/014002. · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satyamurty, P., da Costa, C. P. W., Manzi, A. O., & Candido, L. A.
Affiliations
  • Universidade do Estado do Amazonas (BR)
  • Programa de Pós‐Graduação em Clima e Ambiente Universidade do Estado do Amazonas Manaus Brazil
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisas da Amazônia (BR)
  • Instituto Nacional de Pesquisa Amazônicas Manaus Brazil
Corresponding author
Satyamurty, Prakki
Venue
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2013-04-11
Volume
40
Issue
7
Pages
1396-1401
ISSN
  • 0094-8276 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-8007
OpenAlex
W2136460453
Cited by
90
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
6.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Geophysical Research Letters (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Climate variability and models
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Flood Risk Assessment and Management
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Hydrology and Watershed Management Studies
Keywords
Rio Negro, moisture convergence, air humidity, North Atlantic sea surface temperature, Amazon rainfall, flood climatology

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review