The DOI matches its Crossref record; 10 of the 10 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Cortical activity to vibrotactile stimulation: An fMRI study in blind and sighted individuals
Open accessAbstract
Blind individuals show visual cortex activity during Braille reading. We examined whether such cross‐modal activations reflect processing somatosensory stimuli independent of language by identifying cortical activity during a one‐back vibrotactile matching task. Three groups (sighted, early‐onset, and late‐onset [>12 years] blind) detected whether paired vibrations (25 and 100 Hz), delivered to the right index finger, differed in frequency. Three successive paired vibrations, followed by a no‐stimulation interval, were presented in a long event‐related design. A fixed effects average z‐score analysis showed increased activity throughout the visuotopic visual cortex, where it was mostly restricted to foveal and parafoveal eccentricities. Early blind showed the most extensive distribution of activity. Late blind exhibited activity mostly in similar regions but with declining response magnitudes with age of blindness onset. Three sighted individuals had suprathreshold activity in V1 but negative responses elsewhere in visual cortex. Mixed effects ANOVA confirmed group distinctions in defined regions (V1, V3, V4v, V7, LOC, and MT). These results suggest cross‐modal adaptation to tactile stimulation in visual cortex independent of language processes. All groups showed increased activity in left primary (S1) and bilateral second somatosensory areas, but without response magnitude differences between groups throughout sensorimotor cortex. Early blind showed the greatest spatial extent of S1 activity. Blind participants had more extensive bilateral activity in anterior intraparietal sulcus and supramarginal gyrus. Extensive usage of touch in Braille reading may underlie observed S1 expansions in the reading finger representation. In addition, learned attentiveness to touch may explain similar expansion of parietal tactile attention regions. Hum. Brain Mapp. 23:210–228, 2004. © 2004 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Forman, S. D., Cohen, J. D., Fitzgerald, M., Eddy, W. F., Mintun, M. A., & Noll, D. C. (1995) · Magnetic Resonance in Medicine · doi:10.1002/mrm.1910330508 · Cited by 3,202
CORTICAL PLASTICITY: From Synapses to Maps
Buonomano, D. V., & Merzenich, M. M. (1998) · Annual Review of Neuroscience · doi:10.1146/annurev.neuro.21.1.149 · Cited by 2,083
Kosslyn, S. M., Ganis, G., & Thompson, W. L. (2001) · Nature Reviews Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/35090055 · Cited by 1,894
Functional MRI evidence for adult motor cortex plasticity during motor skill learning
Kami, A., Meyer, G., Jezzard, P., Adams, M. M., Turner, R., & Ungerleider, L. G. (1995) · Nature · doi:10.1038/377155a0 · Cited by 1,883
Activation of the primary visual cortex by Braille reading in blind subjects
Sadato, N., Pascual-Leone, A., Grafman, J., Ibañez, V., Deiber, M.-P., Dold, G., & Hallett, M. (1996) · Nature · doi:10.1038/380526a0 · Cited by 1,253
Compensatory plasticity and sensory substitution in the cerebral cortex
Rauschecker, J. P. (1995) · Trends in Neurosciences · doi:10.1016/0166-2236(95)93948-w · Cited by 590
Chapter 27 The metamodal organization of the brain
Pascual-Leone, A., & Hamilton, R. (2001) · Progress in Brain Research · doi:10.1016/s0079-6123(01)34028-1 · Cited by 540 · cited 1×
“The principal findings were that visual cortex excitability increased after 60 min of no vision [Boroojerdi et al., 2000] and responded to tactile stimulation after subjects wore blindfolds for 5 days [Pascual-Leone and Hamilton, 2001].”
BackgroundVisual cortex activity in early and late blind people
Burton, H. (2003) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.23-10-04005.2003 · Cited by 270
Self-citationArno, P., De Volder, A. G., Vanlierde, A., Wanet-Defalque, M.-C., Streel, E., Robert, A., Sanabria-Bohórquez, S., & Veraart, C. (2001) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0731 · Cited by 148
Tactile acuity, aging, and braille reading in long-term blindness.
Stevens, J. C., Foulke, E., & Patterson, M. Q. (1996) · Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied · doi:10.1037/1076-898x.2.2.91 · Cited by 147
Cited by
See me, hear me, touch me: multisensory integration in lateral occipital-temporal cortex
Beauchamp, M. S. (2005) · Current Opinion in Neurobiology · doi:10.1016/j.conb.2005.03.011 · Cited by 401
Compensatory plasticity and cross-modal reorganization following early visual deprivation
Kupers, R., & Ptito, M. (2014) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2013.08.001 · Cited by 293
Auditory motion perception activates visual motion areas in early blind subjects
Poirier, C., Collignon, O., Scheiber, C., Renier, L., Vanlierde, A., Tranduy, D., Veraart, C., & De Volder, A. G. (2006) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.036 · Cited by 227
Early but not late-blindness leads to enhanced auditory perception
Wan, C. Y., Wood, A. G., Reutens, D. C., & Wilson, S. J. (2010) · Neuropsychologia · doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.016 · Cited by 192
Voss, P., Gougoux, F., Zatorre, R. J., Lassonde, M., & Lepore, F. (2008) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.12.020 · Cited by 161
Metadata
- Authors
- Burton, H., Sinclair, R. J., & McLaren, D. G.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-08-05
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 210-228
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2002025120
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 10
- FWCI
- 5.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cortical activity to vibrotactile stimulation: An fMRI study in blind and sighted individuals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20064
- The paper
- Burton, H., Sinclair, R. J., & McLaren, D. G. (2004). Cortical activity to vibrotactile stimulation: An fMRI study in blind and sighted individuals. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20064
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.