Cited by 227Tactile and Sensory InteractionsMultisensory perception and integrationNeuroscience and Music Perception

Auditory motion perception activates visual motion areas in early blind subjects

Open access
Poirier, C., Collignon, O., Scheiber, C., Renier, L., Vanlierde, A., Tranduy, D., Veraart, C., De Volder, A.G.·2006·NeuroImage

Abstract

We have previously shown that some visual motion areas can be specifically recruited by auditory motion processing in blindfolded sighted subjects [Poirier, C., Collignon, O., De Volder, A.G., Renier, L., Vanlierde, A., Tranduy, D., Scheiber, C., 2005. Specific activation of V5 brain area by auditory motion processing: an fMRI study. Brain Res. Cogn. Brain Res. 25, 650-658]. The present fMRI study investigated whether auditory motion processing may recruit the same brain areas in early blind subjects. The task consisted of simultaneously determining both the nature of a sound stimulus (pure tone or complex sound) and the presence or absence of its movement. When a movement was present, blind subjects had to identify its direction. Auditory motion processing, as compared to static sound processing, activated the brain network of auditory and visual motion processing classically observed in sighted subjects. Accordingly, brain areas previously considered as specific to visual motion processing could be specifically recruited in blind people by motion stimuli presented through the auditory modality. This indicates that the occipital cortex of blind people could be organized in a modular way, as in sighted people. The similarity of these results with those we previously observed in sighted subjects suggests that occipital recruitment in blind people could be mediated by the same anatomical connections as in sighted subjects.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.11.036

Cites

60 of 60 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Poirier, C., Collignon, O., Scheiber, C., Renier, L., Vanlierde, A., Tranduy, D., Veraart, C., & De Volder, A. G.
Affiliations
UCLouvain (BE)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-05
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
279-285
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091794409
Cited by
227
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 18 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 22 · 2012: 15
FWCI
4.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DIAL (Catholic University of Leuven) (submittedVersion)
  • Newcastle University ePrints (Newcastle Univesity)
Funders
Fonds De La Recherche Scientifique - FNRS
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Tactile and Sensory Interactions
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Multisensory perception and integration
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Music Perception
Keywords
auditory motion perception, early blindness, V5, occipital cortex, auditory-visual interaction, brain modularity, sound localization
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Blindness, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Cortex, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Motion Perception, Nerve Net, Occipital Lobe, Orientation, Pitch Perception, Recruitment, Neurophysiological, Sound Localization, Visual Perception, Imaging, Three-Dimensional

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review