The DOI matches its Crossref record; 28 of the 28 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates analyzed using the ICBM‐152 brain template
Open accessAbstract
MNI coordinates determined using SPM2 and FSL/ FLIRT with the ICBM‐152 template were compared to Talairach coordinates determined using a landmark‐based Talairach registration method (TAL). Analysis revealed a clear‐cut bias in reference frames (origin, orientation) and scaling (brain size). Accordingly, ICBM‐152 fitted brains were consistently larger, oriented more nose down, and translated slightly down relative to TAL fitted brains. Whole brain analysis of MNI/Talairach coordinate disparity revealed an ellipsoidal pattern with disparity ranging from zero at a point deep within the left hemisphere to greater than 1‐cm for some anterior brain areas. MNI/Talairach coordinate disparity was generally less for brains fitted using FSL. The mni2tal transform generally reduced MNI/Talairach coordinate disparity for inferior brain areas but increased disparity for anterior, posterior, and superior areas. Coordinate disparity patterns differed for brain templates (MNI‐305, ICBM‐152) using the same fitting method (FSL/ FLIRT ) and for different fitting methods (SPM2, FSL/ FLIRT ) using the same template (ICBM‐152). An MNI‐to‐Talairach (MTT) transform to correct for bias between MNI and Talairach coordinates was formulated using a best‐fit analysis in one hundred high‐resolution 3‐D MR brain images. MTT transforms optimized for SPM2 and FSL were shown to reduced group mean MNI/Talairach coordinate disparity from a 5‐13 mm to 1‐2 mm for both deep and superficial brain sites. MTT transforms provide a validated means to convert MNI coordinates to Talairach compatible coordinates for studies using either SPM2 or FSL/ FLIRT with the ICBM‐152 template. Hum Brain Mapp 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Differences in coordinate spaces (MNI vs. Talairach space) were accounted for by transforming coordinates reported in Talairach space into MNI coordinates using a linear transformation (Lancaster et al., 2007).”
From Meditation-related activations are modulated by the practices needed to obtain it and by the expertise: an ALE meta-analysis study (2013) · cites this paper as Lancaster et al., 2007
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredIn the citing paper
“As the MNI/Talairach coordinate bias associated with reference frame (position and orientation) and scale (brain size) can be substantially reduced using the best-fit tal2icbm transform (Lancaster et al. 2007), coordinates that were not reported in the MNI space were transformed using the Lancaster transformation.”
From Large-scale functional neural network correlates of response inhibition: an fMRI meta-analysis (2017) · cites this paper as Lancaster et al. 2007
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Jenkinson, M., Bannister, P., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2002.1132 · Cited by 11,888
Co-Planar Stereotaxic Atlas of the Human Brain
Talairach, J., & Tournoux, P. (1988) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 11,798
Talairach, J., Tournoux, P., & Rayport, M. (1988) · Thieme eBooks · Cited by 5,058
A generalized inverse for matrices
Penrose, R. (1955) · Mathematical Proceedings of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · doi:10.1017/s0305004100030401 · Cited by 4,611
Spatial registration and normalization of images
Friston, K. J., Ashburner, J., Frith, C., Poline, J.-B., Heather, J. D., & Frackowiak, R. S. J. (1995) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.460030303 · Cited by 3,744
Automatic 3D intersubject registration of MR volumetric data in standardized Talairach space
Collins, D. L., Neelin, P., Peters, T. M., & Evans, A. C. (1994) · Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography · doi:10.1097/00004728-199403000-00005 · Cited by 3,431 · cited 4×
“D brain image template to guide fitting has evolved as a popular alternative to earlier landmark-based methods [Ashburner and Friston, 1999; Chau et al., 2005; Collins et al., 1994].”
MethodInfluentialSelf-citationMazziotta, J. C., Toga, A. W., Evans, A. C., Fox, P. T., Lancaster, J. L., Zilles, K., Woods, R. P., Paus, T., Simpson, G. V., Pike, G. B., et al. (2001) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2001.0915 · Cited by 2,417
Self-citationA Probabilistic Atlas of the Human Brain: Theory and Rationale for Its Development
Mazziotta, J. C., Toga, A. W., Evans, A., Fox, P. T., & Lancaster, J. L. (1995) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1995.1012 · Cited by 1,578
Self-citation3D statistical neuroanatomical models from 305 MRI volumes
Evans, A. C., Collins, D. L., Mills, S., Brown, E. D., Kelly, R. L., & Peters, T. M. (2005) · IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (NSS/MIC) · doi:10.1109/nssmic.1993.373602 · Cited by 1,487
Self-citationThe problem of functional localization in the human brain
Brett, M., Johnsrude, I. S., & Owen, A. M. (2002) · Nature reviews. Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nrn756 · Cited by 1,154
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- Fox PT, 1994, Advances in Functional Neuroimaging: Technical Foundations, 98
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Thomas Yeo, B. T., Krienen, F. M., Sepulcre, J., Sabuncu, M. R., Lashkari, D., Hollinshead, M., Roffman, J. L., Smoller, J. W., Zöllei, L., Polimeni, J. R., et al. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00338.2011 · Cited by 9,182
The organization of the human cerebellum estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity
Buckner, R. L., Krienen, F. M., Castellanos, A., Diaz, J. C., & Yeo, B. T. T. (2011) · Journal of Neurophysiology · doi:10.1152/jn.00339.2011 · Cited by 7,304
Binder, J. R., Desai, R. H., Graves, W. W., & Conant, L. L. (2009) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bhp055 · Cited by 4,060
Large-scale automated synthesis of human functional neuroimaging data.
Yarkoni, T., Poldrack, R. A., Nichols, T. E., Van Essen, D. C., & Wager, T. D. (2011) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.1635 · Cited by 3,686
Functional topography in the human cerebellum: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies
STOODLEY, C., & SCHMAHMANN, J. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.08.039 · Cited by 2,183
Metadata
- Authors
- Lancaster, J. L., Tordesillas‐Gutiérrez, D., Martinez, M., Salinas, F., Evans, A., Zilles, K., Mazziotta, J. C., & Fox, P. T.
- Affiliations
- The University of Texas at San Antonio Health Science Center (US)
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA)
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-01-31
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 1194-1205
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- PMC
- PMC6871323
- OpenAlex
- W2134610285
- Cited by
- 1,464
- References
- 28
- Citations by year
- 2026: 55 · 2025: 78 · 2024: 66 · 2023: 89 · 2022: 91 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 76 · 2019: 86 · 2018: 71 · 2017: 99 · 2016: 89 · 2015: 85 · 2014: 94 · 2013: 87 · 2012: 91
- FWCI
- 59.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Human Brain Mapping (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- JuSER (Forschungszentrum Jülich) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH065728, 5 32 MH65728-03)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (P20 MH/ DA52176)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
- Keywords
- Talairach coordinates, coordinate transformation, landmark-based registration, brain size scaling
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Brain, Brain Mapping, Fourier Analysis, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Models, Anatomic, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Reference Values, Software, Stereotaxic Techniques, Bias, Imaging, Three-Dimensional
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
