The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Relation between brain lesion location and clinical outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study using voxel‐based approaches
Abstract
The early prediction of consciousness recovery from traumatic brain injury (TBI) is crucial to make decisions about the appropriate use of prolonged intensive care. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been proposed as a biomarker of white matter injury that could be used in a classification purpose. Instead of region‐of‐interest‐based approach, we applied voxel‐based approaches (voxel‐based DTI and tract‐based spatial statistics) on 30 patients with TBI to identify, without any prior, the brain regions that were specifically damaged in unfavorable 1‐year outcome group compared to the favorable one. DTI were acquired at mean 23 days (5–53 days) and two DTI‐derived indices, fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), were tested. Our results showed that (1) ADC is not a relevant biomarker for early 1‐year outcome prognosis; (2) FA measured in inferior longitudinal fasciculus, in cerebral peduncle, in posterior limb of the internal capsule, and in posterior corpus callosum is specifically decreased in unfavorable outcome group compare to the favorable one; (3) a linear discriminant analysis using the FA measured in these four regions showed good classification performance (sensitivity = 86% and specificity = 86%). These findings confirm the relevance of the use of DTI as biomarkers for consciousness recovery after TBI and support the possible use of these biomarkers for early classification of patients. Hum Brain Mapp, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Several studies have demonstrated the clinical usefulness of DTI by estimating some areas of the lower single component of the ARAS from the RF to the thalamus in patients with impaired consciousness (Perlbarg et al., 2009; Tollard et al., 2009; Newcombe et al., 2010; Fernandez-Espejo et al., 2011).”
From The Ascending Reticular Activating System from Pontine Reticular Formation to the Thalamus in the Human Brain (2013) · cites this paper as Perlbarg et al., 2009
In the citing paper
“Several recent studies have attempted to demonstrate the usefulness of DTI for evaluation of lesions in patients with impaired consciousness and connectivity of specific ARAS nuclei in the human brain (Voss et al., 2006; Perlbarg et al., 2009; Tollard et al., 2009; Tshibanda et al., 2009; Fernandez-Espejo et al., 2010, 2011; Newcombe et al., 2010; Edlow et al., 2012).”
From The Ascending Reticular Activating System from Pontine Reticular Formation to the Thalamus in the Human Brain (2013) · cites this paper as Perlbarg et al., 2009
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 24
- 10.1136/jnnp.2006.112987 · DOI
- Arfanakis K, 2002, Diffusion tensor MR imaging in diffuse axonal injury, Am J Neuroradiol, 23, 794
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.04.254 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1528-1157.44.s10.3.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s00234-002-0891-y · DOI
- 10.1093/bja/aem141 · DOI
- 10.1097/00001199-199502000-00006 · DOI
- 10.1089/0897715041269731 · DOI
- 10.1089/neu.2007.0339 · DOI
- 10.1097/00004728-200301000-00002 · DOI
- Huisman TA, 2004, Diffusion tensor imaging as potential biomarker of white matter injury in diffuse axonal injury, Am J Neuroradiol, 25, 370
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.02.013 · DOI
- 10.1002/jmri.21342 · DOI
- 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f63c51 · DOI
- Marshall LF, 1991, A new classification of head injury based on computerised tomography, J Neurosurg, 75, 514, 10.3171/sup.1991.75.1s.0s14 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.2005.077875 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0010-0277(00)00127-X · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/mrm.1910360612 · DOI
- Ptak T, 2003, Cerebral fractional anisotropy score in trauma patients: A new indicator of white matter injury after trauma, Am J Radiol, 181, 1401
- 10.1093/brain/awm294 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.02.024 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.2006.101758 · DOI
- 10.1186/cc6107 · DOI
- 10.1007/s00415-008-0658-4 · DOI · Paper page
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cubon, V. A., Putukian, M., Boyer, C., & Dettwiler, A. (2011) · Journal of Neurotrauma · doi:10.1089/neu.2010.1430 · Cited by 297
Diffusion tensor imaging studies of mild traumatic brain injury: a meta-analysis
Aoki, Y., Inokuchi, R., Gunshin, M., Yahagi, N., & Suwa, H. (2012) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2012-302742 · Cited by 237
Yeo, S. S., Chang, P. H., & Jang, S. H. (2013) · Frontiers in Human Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00416 · Cited by 162
Diffusion Tensor Imaging Analysis of Frontal Lobes in Pediatric Traumatic Brain Injury
Oni, M. B., Wilde, E. A., Bigler, E. D., McCauley, S. R., Wu, T. C., Yallampalli, R., Chu, Z., Li, X., Hunter, J. V., Vasquez, A. C., et al. (2010) · Journal of Child Neurology · doi:10.1177/0883073809356034 · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Perlbarg, V., Puybasset, L., Tollard, E., Lehéricy, S., Benali, H., & Galanaud, D.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2009-11-17
- Volume
- 30
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 3924-3933
- ISSN
- 1065-9471
- 1097-0193
- Cited by
- 107
- References
- 0
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Relation between brain lesion location and clinical outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study using voxel‐based approaches. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20817
- The paper
- Perlbarg, V., Puybasset, L., Tollard, E., Lehéricy, S., Benali, H., & Galanaud, D. (2009). Relation between brain lesion location and clinical outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury: A diffusion tensor imaging study using voxel‐based approaches. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20817