The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Event‐related potential and functional MRI measures of face‐selectivity are highly correlated: A simultaneous ERP‐fMRI investigation
Open accessAbstract
A face‐selective neural signal is reliably found in humans with functional MRI and event‐related potential (ERP) measures, which provide complementary information about the spatial and temporal properties of the neural response. However, because most neuroimaging studies so far have studied ERP and fMRI face‐selective markers separately, the relationship between them is still unknown. Here we simultaneously recorded fMRI and ERP responses to faces and chairs to examine the correlations across subjects between the magnitudes of fMRI and ERP face‐selectivity measures. Findings show that the face‐selective responses in the temporal lobe (i.e., fusiform gyrus—FFA) and superior temporal sulcus (fSTS), but not the face‐selective response in the occipital cortex (OFA), were highly correlated with the face‐selective N170 component. In contrast, the OFA was correlated with earlier ERPs at about 110 ms after stimulus‐onset. Importantly, these correlations reveal a temporal dissociation between the face‐selective area in the occipital lobe and face‐selective areas in the temporal lobe. Despite the very different time‐scale of the fMRI and EEG signals, our data show that a correlation analysis across subjects may be informative with respect to the latency in which different brain regions process information. Hum Brain Mapp, 2010. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The fusiform face area: a module in human extrastriate cortex specialized for face perception
Kanwisher, N., McDermott, J., & Chun, M. M. (1997) · The Journal of Neuroscience · doi:10.1523/jneurosci.17-11-04302.1997 · Cited by 7,738
Social perception from visual cues: Role of the STS region
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/s1364-6613(00)01501-1 · Cited by 2,461
A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI
Allen, P. J., Josephs, O., & Turner, R. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0599 · Cited by 1,301
Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus
McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J. C., & Allison, T. (1997) · Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience · doi:10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.605 · Cited by 1,127
Eichele, T., Specht, K., Moosmann, M., Jongsma, M. L. A., Quiroga, R. Q., Nordby, H., & Hugdahl, K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0505508102 · Cited by 308
Cited by
N170 sensitivity to facial expression: A meta-analysis
Hinojosa, J. A., Mercado, F., & Carretié, L. (2015) · Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2015.06.002 · Cited by 493
Understanding face perception by means of human electrophysiology
Rossion, B. (2014) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2014.02.013 · Cited by 314
Petroni, A., Canales-Johnson, A., Urquina, H., Guex, R., Hurtado, E., Blenkmann, A., von Ellenrieder, N., Manes, F., Sigman, M., & Ibañez, A. (2011) · Neuroscience Letters · doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2011.09.062 · Cited by 59
Metadata
- Authors
- Sadeh, B., Podlipsky, I., Zhdanov, A., & Yovel, G.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2010-02-02
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1490-1501
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2016780239
- Cited by
- 228
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.87
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Event‐related potential and functional MRI measures of face‐selectivity are highly correlated: A simultaneous ERP‐fMRI investigation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.20952
- The paper
- Sadeh, B., Podlipsky, I., Zhdanov, A., & Yovel, G. (2010). Event‐related potential and functional MRI measures of face‐selectivity are highly correlated: A simultaneous ERP‐fMRI investigation. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20952
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.