Cited by 1,301EEG and Brain-Computer InterfacesAdvanced MRI Techniques and ApplicationsNeuroscience and Neural Engineering

A Method for Removing Imaging Artifact from Continuous EEG Recorded during Functional MRI

Allen, Philip J., Josephs, Oliver, Turner, Robert·2000·NeuroImage

Abstract

Combined EEG/fMRI recording has been used to localize the generators of EEG events and to identify subject state in cognitive studies and is of increasing interest. However, the large EEG artifacts induced during fMRI have precluded simultaneous EEG and fMRI recording, restricting study design. Removing this artifact is difficult, as it normally exceeds EEG significantly and contains components in the EEG frequency range. We have developed a recording system and an artifact reduction method that reduce this artifact effectively. The recording system has large dynamic range to capture both low-amplitude EEG and large imaging artifact without distortion (resolution 2 microV, range 33.3 mV), 5-kHz sampling, and low-pass filtering prior to the main gain stage. Imaging artifact is reduced by subtracting an averaged artifact waveform, followed by adaptive noise cancellation to reduce any residual artifact. This method was validated in recordings from five subjects using periodic and continuous fMRI sequences. Spectral analysis revealed differences of only 10 to 18% between EEG recorded in the scanner without fMRI and the corrected EEG. Ninety-nine percent of spike waves (median 74 microV) added to the recordings were identified in the corrected EEG compared to 12% in the uncorrected EEG. The median noise after artifact reduction was 8 microV. All these measures indicate that most of the artifact was removed, with minimal EEG distortion. Using this recording system and artifact reduction method, we have demonstrated that simultaneous EEG/fMRI studies are for the first time possible, extending the scope of EEG/fMRI studies considerably.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1006/nimg.2000.0599

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Strong electromagnetic interference causes artifacts in simultaneously acquired fMRI and EEG signals, a critical challenge for integration.

    “A critical challenge for integrating fMRI and EEG is the strong electromagnetic interference that causes artifacts in simultaneously acquired fMRI and EEG signals (178).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Allen, P. J., Josephs, O., & Turner, R.
Affiliations
  • National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery (GB)
  • UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
Venue
NeuroImage
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2000-08
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
230-239
ISSN
1053-8119 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2163254535
Cited by
1,301
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 57 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 60 · 2021: 68 · 2020: 51 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 60 · 2016: 67 · 2015: 57 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 82 · 2012: 69
FWCI
7.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • NeuroImage (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Max Planck Digital Library (submittedVersion)
  • MPG.PuRe (Max Planck Society) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced MRI Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Keywords
EEG artifact removal, functional MRI, artifact reduction, adaptive noise cancellation, low-pass filtering, EEG noise
MeSH terms
Adult, Algorithms, Electroencephalography, Female, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review