Cited by 1,127Face Recognition and PerceptionFace recognition and analysisEvolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior

Face-specific processing in the human fusiform gyrus

McCarthy, Gregory, Puce, Aina, Gore, John C., Allison, Truett·1997·Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

The perception of faces is sometimes regarded as a specialized task involving discrete brain regions. In an attempt to identi$ face-specific cortex, we used functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) to measure activation evoked by faces presented in a continuously changing montage of common objects or in a similar montage of nonobjects. Bilateral regions of the posterior fusiform gyrus were activated by faces viewed among nonobjects, but when viewed among objects, faces activated only a focal right fusiform region. To determine whether this focal activation would occur for another category of familiar stimuli, subjects viewed flowers presented among nonobjects and objects. While flowers among nonobjects evoked bilateral fusiform activation, flowers among objects evoked no activation. These results demonstrate that both faces and flowers activate large and partially overlapping regions of inferior extrastriate cortex. A smaller region, located primarily in the right lateral fusiform gyrus, is activated specifically by faces.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1162/jocn.1997.9.5.605

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The fusiform gyrus is central to visual face perception and meta-analyses show it is hyper-reactive to negative emotional stimuli in SAD.

    “The fusiform gyrus plays a central role in visual face perception (McCarthy, Puce, Gore, & Allison, 1997), and has been shown in a meta-analyses to be hyper-reactive to negative emotional stimuli in social anxiety disorder (Brühl, Delsignore, et al., 2014; Etkin & Wager, 2007).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
McCarthy, G., Puce, A., Gore, J. C., & Allison, T.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Venue
Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience
Published
1997
Volume
9
Issue
5
Pages
605-610
ISSN
  • 0898-929X (ISSN-L)
  • 1530-8898
OpenAlex
W2023961799
Cited by
1,127
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 31 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 25 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 32 · 2020: 43 · 2019: 34 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 43 · 2013: 49 · 2012: 46
FWCI
19.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • IUScholarWorks (Indiana University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs
  • Yale University
  • National Institute of Mental Health
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Face recognition and analysis
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Keywords
face perception, fusiform gyrus, object recognition, flowers, hemispheric lateralization, visual object processing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review