Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 230

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 26 of the 26 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Network anticorrelations, global regression, and phase‐shifted soft tissue correction

Open access
Anderson, Jeffrey S., Druzgal, T. Jason, Lopez‐Larson, Melissa, Jeong, Eun‐Kee, Desai, Krishnaji, Yurgelun‐Todd, Deborah·2011·Human Brain Mapping

Abstract

Synchronized low‐frequency BOLD fluctuations are observed in dissociable large‐scale, distributed networks with functional specialization. Two such networks, referred to as the task‐positive network (TPN) and the task‐negative network (TNN) because they tend to be active or inactive during cognitively demanding tasks, show reproducible anticorrelation of resting BOLD fluctuations after removal of the global brain signal. Because global signal regression mandates that anticorrelated regions to a given seed region must exist, it is unclear whether such anticorrelations are an artifact of global regression or an intrinsic property of neural activity. In this study, we demonstrate from simulated data that spurious anticorrelations are introduced during global regression for any two networks as a linear function of their size. Using actual resting state data, we also show that both the TPN and TNN become anticorrelated with the orbits when soft tissues are included in the global regression algorithm. Finally, we propose a technique using phase‐shifted soft tissue regression (PSTCor) that allows improved correction of global physiological artifacts without global regression that shows improved anatomic specificity to global regression but does not show significant network anticorrelations. These results imply that observed anticorrelations between TNN and TPN may be largely or entirely artifactual in the resting state. These results also imply that differences in network anticorrelations attributed to pathophysiological or behavioral states may be due to differences in network size or recruitment rather than actual anticorrelations. Hum Brain Mapp, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hbm.21079

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 26 references

Cited by

See all 230

Metadata

Authors
Anderson, J. S., Druzgal, T. J., Lopez‐Larson, M., Jeong, E., Desai, K., & Yurgelun‐Todd, D.
Venue
Human Brain Mapping
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-10
Volume
32
Issue
6
Pages
919-934
ISSN
  • 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0193
OpenAlex
W1998940813
Cited by
230
References
26
FWCI
9.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
green

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Network anticorrelations, global regression, and phase‐shifted soft tissue correction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.21079
The paper
Anderson, J. S., Druzgal, T. J., Lopez‐Larson, M., Jeong, E., Desai, K., & Yurgelun‐Todd, D. (2011). Network anticorrelations, global regression, and phase‐shifted soft tissue correction. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.21079

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.