The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A statistical framework for neuroimaging data analysis based on mutual information estimated via a gaussian copula
Open accessAbstract
We begin by reviewing the statistical framework of information theory as applicable to neuroimaging data analysis. A major factor hindering wider adoption of this framework in neuroimaging is the difficulty of estimating information theoretic quantities in practice. We present a novel estimation technique that combines the statistical theory of copulas with the closed form solution for the entropy of Gaussian variables. This results in a general, computationally efficient, flexible, and robust multivariate statistical framework that provides effect sizes on a common meaningful scale, allows for unified treatment of discrete, continuous, unidimensional and multidimensional variables, and enables direct comparisons of representations from behavioral and brain responses across any recording modality. We validate the use of this estimate as a statistical test within a neuroimaging context, considering both discrete stimulus classes and continuous stimulus features. We also present examples of analyses facilitated by these developments, including application of multivariate analyses to MEG planar magnetic field gradients, and pairwise temporal interactions in evoked EEG responses. We show the benefit of considering the instantaneous temporal derivative together with the raw values of M/EEG signals as a multivariate response, how we can separately quantify modulations of amplitude and direction for vector quantities, and how we can measure the emergence of novel information over time in evoked responses. Open‐source Matlab and Python code implementing the new methods accompanies this article. Hum Brain Mapp 38:1541–1573, 2017 . © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods
Granger, C. W. J. (1969) · Econometrica · doi:10.2307/1912791 · Cited by 22,989
Nonparametric statistical testing of EEG- and MEG-data
Maris, E., & Oostenveld, R. (2007) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2007.03.024 · Cited by 8,496
The Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test for Goodness of Fit
Massey, F. J. (1951) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1951.10500769 · Cited by 7,210
Nonparametric permutation tests for functional neuroimaging: A primer with examples
Nichols, T. E., & Holmes, A. P. (2002) · Human Brain Mapping · doi:10.1002/hbm.1058 · Cited by 6,256
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 2×
“Similar in spirit to Matthews’ correlation coefficient [Baldi et al., 2000; Matthews, 1975], this provides an overall accuracy measure, which incorporates possible asymmetries resulting from unbalanced classes.”
ResultSMITH, S., & NICHOLS, T. (2009) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.03.061 · Cited by 5,250
Neural Networks and the Bias/Variance Dilemma
Geman, S., Bienenstock, E., & Doursat, R. (1992) · Neural Computation · doi:10.1162/neco.1992.4.1.1 · Cited by 3,578 · cited 1×
“A further consideration with binned methods is that they suffer from the curse of dimensionality [Geman et al., 1992].”
CircStat : A MATLAB Toolbox for Circular Statistics
Berens, P. (2009) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v031.i10 · Cited by 3,099
Psychophysiological and Modulatory Interactions in Neuroimaging
Friston, K. J., Buechel, C., Fink, G. R., Morris, J., Rolls, E., & Dolan, R. J. (1997) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.1997.0291 · Cited by 3,097
Cited by
Keitel, A., Gross, J., & Kayser, C. (2018) · PLOS Biology · doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.2004473 · Cited by 312
Self-citationDistinct sensitivity to spectrotemporal modulation supports brain asymmetry for speech and melody
Albouy, P., Benjamin, L., Morillon, B., & Zatorre, R. J. (2020) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aaz3468 · Cited by 298
Information decomposition and the informational architecture of the brain
Luppi, A. I., Rosas, F. E., Mediano, P. A. M., Menon, D. K., & Stamatakis, E. A. (2024) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2023.11.005 · Cited by 140
Cogitate Consortium, Ferrante, O., Gorska-Klimowska, U., Henin, S., Hirschhorn, R., Khalaf, A., Lepauvre, A., Liu, L., Richter, D., Vidal, Y., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-025-08888-1 · Cited by 136
“The SVM cost function was weighted by the number of trials per class to reduce bias to the class with the highest number.”
Moguilner, S., Baez, S., Hernandez, H., Migeot, J., Legaz, A., Gonzalez-Gomez, R., Farina, F. R., Prado, P., Cuadros, J., Tagliazucchi, E., et al. (2024) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03209-x · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- Ince, R. A. A., Giordano, B. L., Kayser, C., Rousselet, G. A., Gross, J., & Schyns, P. G.
- Venue
- Human Brain Mapping
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2016-11-17
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1541-1573
- ISSN
- 1065-9471 (ISSN-L)
- 1097-0193
- OpenAlex
- W2950718631
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 12.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A statistical framework for neuroimaging data analysis based on mutual information estimated via a gaussian copula. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hbm.23471
- The paper
- Ince, R. A. A., Giordano, B. L., Kayser, C., Rousselet, G. A., Gross, J., & Schyns, P. G. (2017). A statistical framework for neuroimaging data analysis based on mutual information estimated via a gaussian copula. Human Brain Mapping. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.23471
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.