Cited by 205Attention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderLabor market dynamics and wage inequalityMental Health Treatment and Access

The effects of childhood ADHD on adult labor market outcomes

Open access
Fletcher, Jason M.·2014·Health Economics

Abstract

Although several types of mental illness, including substance abuse disorders, have been linked with poor labor market outcomes, no current research has been able to examine the effects of childhood attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Because ADHD has become one of the most prevalent childhood mental conditions, it is useful to understand the full set of consequences of the illness. This article uses a longitudinal national sample, including sibling pairs, to show the important labor market outcome consequences of ADHD. The employment reduction is between 10 and 14 percentage points, the earnings reduction is approximately 33%, and the increase in social assistance is 15 points, figures that are larger than many estimates of the Black people/White people earnings gap and the gender earnings gap. A small share of the link is explained by educational attainments and co‐morbid health conditions and behaviors. The results also show important differences in labor market consequences by family background and age of onset. These findings, along with similar research showing that ADHD is linked with poor education outcomes and adult crime, suggest the importance of treating childhood ADHD to foster human capital. Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hec.2907

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A longitudinal US study of about 15,000 adolescents found that those with ADHD had a 12% reduction in employment and a 34% reduction in earnings relative to non-ADHD siblings.

    “A longitudinal study of some 15,000 U.S. adolescents reported that those with ADHD had a 12% reduction in employment and a 34% reduction in earnings relative to non-ADHD siblings”

    From The World Federation of ADHD International Consensus Statement: 208 Evidence-based conclusions about the disorder (2021) · cites this paper as Fletcher, 2014

    Data and Empirical Methods reports that about 15,000 participants were followed longitudinally, but the sibling analyses used nearly 3,500. The Results sections report 34–36% lower earnings and a 12–14 percentage-point reduction in employment compared with siblings; the claim incorrectly calls the employment difference a 12% reduction. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Fletcher JM. 2011 The medium run educational effects of low birth weight. Economics of Education Review 30(3): 517– 527.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fletcher, J. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Fletcher, Jason M.
Venue
Health Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2013-02-21
Volume
23
Issue
2
Pages
159-181
ISSN
  • 1057-9230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1050
OpenAlex
W2120281496
Cited by
205
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 6 · 2012: 1
FWCI
5.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Yale University
  • National Institutes of Health
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • National Institute on Aging (P30AG017266)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01- HD31921, P01HD031921)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Labor market dynamics and wage inequality
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
childhood ADHD, employment, earnings, social assistance, earnings gap, gender pay gap, educational attainment, comorbid health conditions, age of onset, family background, human capital, sibling comparison
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Attention Deficit Disorder with Hyperactivity, Child, Child, Preschool, Crime, Employment, Female, Humans, Income, Infant, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Mental Health, Public Assistance, Residence Characteristics, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, United States, Substance-Related Disorders, Siblings, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review