Cited by 353Mental Health Treatment and AccessSchool Choice and PerformanceHealth disparities and outcomes

Adolescent depression and educational attainment: results using sibling fixed effects

Open access
Fletcher, Jason M.·2010·Health Economics

Abstract

This paper contributes to the literature on the relationship between adolescent depression and educational attainment in several ways. First, while cross‐sectional data are normally used, this paper uses longitudinal data in order to defend against the potential of reverse causality. Second, this is the first paper in the literature to control for sibling‐fixed effects in examining the relationship between adolescent depressive symptoms and human capital accumulation. Importantly, this eliminates omitted factors such as family and neighborhood characteristics common to siblings that affect both depressive symptoms and educational attainments (e.g. neighborhood crime, and family resources). Third, this paper examines the effects of both an indicator and scale of depressive symptoms and finds important associations with these depressive symptoms and human capital accumulation. Though the results cannot be given a causal interpretation, the findings show a negative relationship between depressive symptoms and years of schooling. The relationship appears to be driven primarily through increasing the chances of dropping out but may have small impacts on the likelihood of college attendance (conditional on high school graduation). In particular, preferred estimates suggest that a standard deviation increase in depressive symptoms is associated with a 25–30% increase in the likelihood of dropping out. Copyright © 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hec.1526

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Mazure C, 2006, Introduction in Understanding Depression in Women
  2. Rosen S, 1977, Human capital: a survey of empirical research, Research in Labor Economics, 1, 3

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fletcher, J. M.
Affiliations
Yale University (US)
Corresponding author
Fletcher, Jason M.
Venue
Health Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2009-07-06
Volume
19
Issue
7
Pages
855-871
ISSN
  • 1057-9230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1050
OpenAlex
W3124374110
Cited by
353
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 25 · 2023: 30 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 38 · 2020: 35 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 52 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 14 · 2012: 11
FWCI
13.32
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Economics (publishedVersion)
  • SSRN Electronic Journal (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P01HD031921)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
adolescent depression, depressive symptoms, educational attainment, school dropout, college attendance, human capital accumulation, sibling fixed effects, reverse causality, years of schooling
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depression, Educational Status, Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Socioeconomic Factors, Student Dropouts, United States, Siblings

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review