Cited by 109Family Dynamics and RelationshipsGender, Labor, and Family DynamicsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Baby bonus in Switzerland: Effects on fertility, newborn health, and birth‐scheduling

Open access
Chuard, Caroline, Chuard‐Keller, Patrick·2021·Health Economics

Abstract

This paper studies the effect of birth allowances (so‐called baby bonus) on fertility, newborn health, and birth‐scheduling in Switzerland. Switzerland provides an optimal quasi‐experiment: 11 out of 26 cantons introduced a baby bonus during the last 50 years at different points in time. To identify the effect of changes in the baby bonus, we employ an event study with control groups using several administrative data sets on births, stillbirths, and infant deaths in Switzerland from 1969 to 2017. While there is no evidence for birth‐scheduling, we find, however, a sizable but only temporary increase in the fertility rate of 5.5% and a permanent but diminishing increase in the birth weight of 2.8%. The latter effect is particularly strong at the lower end of the birth weight distribution. Furthermore, we document substantial heterogeneity by citizenship of mothers.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hec.4366

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The amount in a baby bonus package can never fully offset the lifetime direct and indirect costs of raising a child.

    “The amount in a baby bonus package can never fully offset the lifetime direct and indirect costs of raising a child (Malak, Rahman, and Yip 2019; Chuard and Chuard-Keller 2021; Sinclair, Boymal, and de Silva 2012).”

    From Family Policies in Low Fertility Countries: Evidence and Reflections (2025) · cites this paper as Chuard and Chuard-Keller 2021

    The Introduction (page unavailable) says children are expensive and describes baby bonuses as lump-sum payments that ease families’ financial pressure. It does not assess lifetime direct and indirect child-rearing costs or establish that a bonus can never fully offset them. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Becker, G. S., & Lewis, H. G. (1973). On the interaction between the quantity and quality of children. Journal of Political Economy, 81(2), S279– S288.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chuard, C., & Chuard‐Keller, P.
Affiliations
University of St.Gallen (CH)
Corresponding author
Chuard, Caroline
Venue
Health Economics
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2021-06-02
Volume
30
Issue
9
Pages
2092-2123
ISSN
  • 1057-9230 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-1050
OpenAlex
W3164496857
Cited by
109
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 103 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1
FWCI
41.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Health Economics (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
  • Alexandria (UniSG) (University of St.Gallen) (submittedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Funders
  • Universität St. Gallen
  • Universität Zürich
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Family Dynamics and Relationships
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
baby bonus, fertility, newborn health, birth weight, stillbirth, infant mortality
MeSH terms
Infant Health, Birth Rate, Birth Weight, Fertility, Humans, Infant, Infant, Newborn, Switzerland

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review