Cited by 176Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Neonatal HealthcareInfant Development and Preterm Care

Is the risk of low birth weight or preterm labor greater when maternal stress is experienced during pregnancy? A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies

Open access
Lima, Silvana Andréa Molina, El Dib, Regina Paolucci, Rodrigues, Meline Rossetto Kron, Ferraz, Guilherme Augusto Rago, Molina, Ana Claudia, Neto, Carlos Alberto Pilan, de Lima, Marcelo Aparecido Ferraz, Rudge, Marilza Vieira Cunha·2018·PLOS ONE

Abstract

Antenatal stress is linked to fetal risks that increase the chances of neonatal complications and reduction of child cognitive ability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate if maternal stress affects fetal, neonatal or child development. The following databases were searched: MEDLINE (1966 to May 2016), Embase (1980 to May 2016), LILACS (1982 to May 2016) and CENTRAL (1972 to May 2016). Observational studies published in English and Portuguese were included whether there was any relationship between fetal and neonatal outcome, such as birth weight, preterm labor, child development with pregnant women that were subjected to any stress type during at least one month of follow-up. Two independent reviewers screened eligible articles, extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. Thus, 8 cohort studies with about 8,271 pregnant women and 1,081,151 children proved eligible. Results suggested a significant association between antenatal stress exposure and increasing rates of low birth weight (Odds ratio (OR) 1.68 [95% Confidential Interval (CI) 1.19, 2.38]). However, there was no statistically significance difference between non-exposed and exposed groups related to preterm labor (OR 1.98 [95% CI 0.91 to 4.31]; I2 = 68%, p = 0.04). Although, results were inconsistent with primary analysis suggesting a significant association between antenatal stress exposure and the occurrence of higher rates of preterm birth (OR 1.42 [95% CI 1.05 to 1.91]; I2 = 68%, p = 0.04) in the sensitivity analysis. Furthermore, the current review has suggested that stress perceived during antenatal negatively influences fetal life and child development. Yet, further studies are necessary with adequate sample size and longer follow-up time to confirm our findings.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1371/journal.pone.0200594

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Huizink, AC. Prenatalstress and its effect on infant development. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. 2000
  2. [41]Pinto-Dussán MC, Aguilar-Mejia OM, Gomez-Rojas JD. Estrés psicológico materno como posiblefactor de riesgoprenatal para eldesarrollo de dificultades cognoscitivas: caracterización neuropsicológica de una muestra colombiana. Univ. Psychol. 2010 9 (3), 749– 59.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lima, S. A. M., El Dib, R. P., Rodrigues, M. R. K., Ferraz, G. A. R., Molina, A. C., Neto, C. A. P., de Lima, M. A. F., & Rudge, M. V. C.
Affiliations
  • Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
  • Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais (BR)
Corresponding author
Lima, Silvana Andréa Molina
Venue
PLOS ONE
Published
2018-07-26
Volume
13
Issue
7
Pages
e0200594
ISSN
1932-6203 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2883611817
Cited by
176
References
62
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 43 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 7
FWCI
3.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • PLoS ONE (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (310953/2015-4)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Infant Development and Preterm Care
Keywords
prenatal stress, maternal stress, low birth weight, preterm labor, preterm birth, fetal outcomes, neonatal outcomes, child development, pregnancy
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Infant, Low Birth Weight, Infant, Newborn, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pregnancy, Stress, Psychological, Risk Assessment, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review