CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 270Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesChildhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 57 of the 57 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Psychosocial adjustment in head and neck cancer: The impact of disfigurement, gender and social support

Katz, Mark R., Irish, Jonathan C., Devins, Gerald M., Rodin, Gary M., Gullane, Patrick J.·2003·Head & Neck
DOI 10.1002/hed.10174
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Background.: The purpose of this study was to examine the psychosocial impact of disfigurement, gender, and social support after surgical treatment of head and neck cancer. Method.: Eighty‐two ambulatory head and neck cancer patients, 6 months or more after treatment and free of active disease were assessed. Ratings of disfigurement were obtained using a valid and reliable 9‐point scale developed for the study. Standardized measures of social support, depressive symptoms, well‐being, and life happiness were used. Results.: The sample as a whole displayed high levels of life happiness, low levels of depression, and positive feelings of well‐being. Women demonstrated higher levels of depression and lower life happiness; subjects with greater disfigurement were more depressed. Social support seemed to buffer the impact of greater levels of disfigurement on well‐being for women but not for men. Conclusion.: These results suggest that women with head and neck cancer who experience low social support and face disfiguring treatment are at greatest risk for psychosocial dysfunction. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 25: 103–112, 2003

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hed.10174

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 54 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Moadel AB, 1998, Psychooncology, 314
  2. Kaplan H, 1999, Synopsis of psychiatry, 171
  3. O'Brien EJ, 1988, MSEI: The Multidimensional Self‐Esteem Inventory‐Professional Manual
  4. Devins GM, 1985, Test critiques 2
  5. AtkinsonT.Is satisfaction a good measure of the perceived quality of life?Proceedings of the American Statistical Association;1978. p123–132.
  6. 1984, SPSS Syntax & reference guide 6.1
  7. Dropkin MJ, 1983, Body image reintegration and coping effectiveness after head and neck surgery, Soc Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Nurs, 2, 7
  8. 10.1037/0003-066X.48.11.1117 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–101 of 101

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Katz, M. R., Irish, J. C., Devins, G. M., Rodin, G. M., & Gullane, P. J.
Affiliations
University Health Network (CA)
ORCID
Rodin, Gary M.
Venue
Head & Neck
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-09-10
Volume
25
Issue
2
Pages
103-112
ISSN
  • 1043-3074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0347
DOI
10.1002/hed.10174
OpenAlex
W2050059426
Cited by
270
References
54
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 13 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 13
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor (vor)
Locations
  • Head & Neck (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Childhood Cancer Survivors' Quality of Life
Keywords
head and neck cancer, facial disfigurement, psychosocial adjustment, gender differences, social support, depression, well-being, life happiness, postoperative appearance, surgical outcomes
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Body Image, Cross-Sectional Studies, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Depression, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Quality of Life, Regression Analysis, Sampling Studies, Sex Factors, Social Support, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review