Cited by 201Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesOral health in cancer treatment

The impact of head and neck cancer and facial disfigurement on the quality of life of patients and their partners

Vickery, Lindsey E., Latchford, Gary, Hewison, Jenny, Bellew, Maggie, Feber, Tricia·2003·Head & Neck

Abstract

Background.: Psychological and physical stresses from head and neck cancer can be substantial for patients and partners. There is minimal research exploring treatment impact, particularly facial disfigurement after surgery. Materials and Methods.: Twenty‐eight surgery and radiotherapy/brachytherapy/chemoradiation patients and 25 of their partners were compared with 23 radiotherapy/brachytherapy patients and 19 partners. Participants completed the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Psychosocial Adaptation to Illness Scale, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality Of Life Scale, including the Head and Neck Cancer module. The Dropkin Disfigurement and Dysfunction scale classified surgical impairment. Results.: Partners reported greater distress than patients on some scales. Patients did not have a lower quality of life compared with normal populations and other cancer patients. However, on the EORTC they did and were comparable to a normed sample of head and neck cancer patients. Treatment modality was not predictive of psychological vulnerability. Discussion.: Head and neck cancer patients do not necessarily experience poor quality of life. The disease can have a significant impact on partners. © 2003 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 25: 289–296, 2003

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hed.10206

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vickery, L. E., Latchford, G., Hewison, J., Bellew, M., & Feber, T.
Affiliations
  • St James's University Hospital (GB)
  • University of Leeds (GB)
Venue
Head & Neck
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-12-12
Volume
25
Issue
4
Pages
289-296
ISSN
  • 1043-3074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0347
OpenAlex
W2003096743
Cited by
201
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 16
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Head & Neck (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Oral health in cancer treatment
Keywords
head and neck cancer, facial disfigurement, quality of life, partners of cancer patients, anxiety and depression, psychosocial adjustment, dyadic adjustment, radiotherapy, chemoradiotherapy, brachytherapy, treatment options
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Aged, Face, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Postoperative Complications, Quality of Life, Stress, Psychological, Spouses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review