Cited by 102Cancer survivorship and careHead and Neck Cancer StudiesOptimism, Hope, and Well-being

Associations between quality of life, coping styles, optimism, and anxiety and depression in pretreatment patients with head and neck cancer

Open access
Horney, Debbie J., Smith, Helen E., McGurk, Mark, Weinman, John, Herold, Jim, Altman, Keith, Llewellyn, Carrie D.·2011·Head & Neck

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Head and neck cancer is often diagnosed at a late stage and consequently radical treatment is necessary. The pretreatment phase is a time of high anxiety and depression for patients. This study aimed to investigate whether anxiety and depression are related to quality of life, coping styles, and dispositional optimism. METHODS: One hundred and three patients were recruited after diagnosis to a questionnaire study. Measures included the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale; SF12v2 Health Survey; Brief COPE, and the Revised Life Orientation Test. RESULTS: Quality of life, in particular emotional role explained a large proportion of the variance in pretreatment anxiety and depression. In addition, the use of negative coping styles was related to high anxiety levels and low levels of optimism were related to higher levels of depression. CONCLUSION: There are a small but significant proportion of pretreatment patients that may benefit from individualized support.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hed.21407

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Horney, D. J., Smith, H. E., McGurk, M., Weinman, J., Herold, J., Altman, K., & Llewellyn, C. D.
Affiliations
  • Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • Royal Sussex County Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Llewellyn, Carrie D.
Venue
Head & Neck
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-01
Volume
33
Issue
1
Pages
65-71
ISSN
  • 1043-3074 (ISSN-L)
  • 1097-0347
OpenAlex
W2115668967
Cited by
102
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
3.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Head & Neck (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Head and Neck Cancer Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
Keywords
head and neck cancer, quality of life, coping styles, dispositional optimism, anxiety, depression, emotional role, negative coping, psychological support
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Affect, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Anxiety Disorders, Attitude to Health, Combined Modality Therapy, Cross-Sectional Studies, Depressive Disorder, Emotions, Female, Head and Neck Neoplasms, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Neoplasm Staging, Preoperative Care, Prognosis, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Comorbidity, Chi-Square Distribution, Survival Analysis, Treatment Outcome, Risk Assessment, Radiotherapy, Adjuvant, Neck Dissection, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review