Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 365

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 30 of the 30 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Characteristic difference of hepatocellular carcinoma between hepatitis B- and C- viral infection in Japan

Open access
Shiratori, Yasushi, Shiina, Shuichiro, Imamura, Masatoshi, Kato, Naoya, Kanai, Fumihiko, Okudaira, Takahito, Teratani, Takuma, Tohgo, Gohichi, Toda, Nobuo, Ohashi, Makoto, Ogura, Keiji, Niwa, Yasuro, Kawabe, Takao, Omata, Masao·1995·Hepatology

Abstract

Characteristics of 205 consecutive patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) admitted during 1990 to 1993 have been analyzed from the standpoint of hepatitis viral infection in Japan. Among 205 HCC patients, 71% of the patients showed positivity for hepatic C virus (HCV) antibody alone, 13% showed positivity both for HCV and HBV (HCV/HBV) antibody, 11% demonstrated HBsAg alone, and negativity of both HCV and HBV antibody in 4% only. Positivity to both HCV antibody and HBsAg was demonstrated in 1% only. Mean detection age of HCVAb-positive HCC as well as both HCV/HBV antibody-positive HCC was 62 ± 7 years, in contrast to 52 ± 13 years in HCC with HBsAg (P < .05). Male-to-female ratio among HCVAb-positive HCC was 3.3:1, in contrast to 5.5:1 among the HCV/HBVAb-positive HCC and 7:1 among HBsAg-positive HCC, but there was no significant difference in the gender distribution between these groups. More than 60% of HCVAb-positive HCC were classified into the stage of Child B and C, whereas 65% of HBsAg-positive HCC was at the stage of Child A. The severity of liver disease was confirmed by liver histology, indicating that more than 70% of the HCVAb-positive HCC and the HCV/HBVAb-positive HCC showed cirrhosis, in contrast to 50% among the HBsAg-positive HCC. Three-year survival rate of HCV Ab-positive HCC and HBV/HCVAb-positive HCC was 68% and 56%, respectively, in contrast to 47% in HBsAg-positive HCC. HCC was found at early stage among the patients receiving periodic medical checkups beforehand, and the prognosis of these HCC patients was significantly better than those who did not receive checkups. From these results, HCV-related HCC occupied over 80% of total HCC in Japan, which are characterized by older age and more severe cirrhosis, as compared with HBsAg-positive HCC. Prognosis of HCV Ab-positive HCC was not significantly better than HBsAg-positive HCC, but the periodical screening naturally improves prognosis because the cases are found usually much earlier (lead time bias) and mostly belong to slow progression type (length bias). (Hepatology 1995; 22:1027-1033.).

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.1840220403

Cites

30 of 30 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 30 references

Cited by

See all 365

Metadata

Authors
Shiratori, Y., Shiina, S., Imamura, M., Kato, N., Kanai, F., Okudaira, T., Teratani, T., Tohgo, G., Toda, N., Ohashi, M., Ogura, K., Niwa, Y., Kawabe, T., & Omata, M.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1995-10
Volume
22
Issue
4
Pages
1027-1033
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2165298960
Cited by
365
References
30
FWCI
7.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Characteristic difference of hepatocellular carcinoma between hepatitis B- and C- viral infection in Japan. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.1840220403
The paper
Shiratori, Y., Shiina, S., Imamura, M., Kato, N., Kanai, F., Okudaira, T., Teratani, T., Tohgo, G., Toda, N., Ohashi, M., Ogura, K., Niwa, Y., Kawabe, T., & Omata, M. (1995). Characteristic difference of hepatocellular carcinoma between hepatitis B- and C- viral infection in Japan. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.1840220403

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.