The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Synbiotic modulation of gut flora: Effect on minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis
Open accessAbstract
Minimal hepatic encephalopathy (MHE) is an important disorder that may seriously impair daily functioning and quality of life in patients with cirrhosis. Treatment with lactulose is of benefit. The possible role of synbiotics (probiotics and fermentable fiber) has not been assessed. We screened 97 consecutive cirrhotic patients without overt hepatic encephalopathy for MHE using the number connection test and measurement of brainstem auditory evoked potentials. MHE, defined by abnormality on at least one test modality, was present in 58 (60%) patients. Fifty-five of these patients with MHE were randomized to receive a synbiotic preparation (n = 20), fermentable fiber alone (n = 20), or placebo (n = 15) for 30 days. Cirrhotic patients with MHE were found to have substantial derangements in the gut microecology, with significant fecal overgrowth of potentially pathogenic Escherichia coli and Staphylococcal species. Synbiotic treatment significantly increased the fecal content of non-urease-producing Lactobacillus species at the expense of these other bacterial species. Such modulation of the gut flora was associated with a significant reduction in blood ammonia levels and reversal of MHE in 50% of patients. Synbiotic treatment was also associated with a significant reduction in endotoxemia. The Child-Turcotte-Pugh functional class improved in nearly 50% of cases. Treatment with fermentable fiber alone was also of benefit in a substantial proportion of patients. In conclusion, treatment with synbiotics or fermentable fiber is an alternative to lactulose for the management of MHE in patients with cirrhosis. (Hepatology 2004;39:1441-1449.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Transection of the oesophagus for bleeding oesophageal varices
Pugh, R. N. H., Murray-Lyon, I. M., Dawson, J. L., Pietroni, M. C., & Williams, R. (1973) · Journal of British Surgery · doi:10.1002/bjs.1800600817 · Cited by 7,941
Cited by
Gut microbiota in health and disease
Sekirov, I., Russell, S. L., Antunes, L. C. M., & Finlay, B. B. (2010) · Physiological Reviews · doi:10.1152/physrev.00045.2009 · Cited by 4,182
Characterization of fecal microbial communities in patients with liver cirrhosis
Chen, Y., Yang, F., Lu, H., Wang, B., Chen, Y., Lei, D., Wang, Y., Zhu, B., & Li, L. (2011) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.24423 · Cited by 1,038
Colonic microbiome is altered in alcoholism
Mutlu, E. A., Gillevet, P. M., Rangwala, H., Sikaroodi, M., Naqvi, A., Engen, P. A., Kwasny, M., Lau, C. K., & Keshavarzian, A. (2012) · American Journal of Physiology-Gastrointestinal and Liver Physiology · doi:10.1152/ajpgi.00380.2011 · Cited by 775
Toll‐like receptors and adaptor molecules in liver disease: Update†
Seki, E., & Brenner, D. A. (2008) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.22306 · Cited by 722
The Gut Microbiome and the Brain
Galland, L. (2014) · Journal of Medicinal Food · doi:10.1089/jmf.2014.7000 · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, Q., Duan, Z. P., Ha, D. K., Bengmark, S., Kurtovic, J., & Riordan, S. M.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2004-05
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1441-1449
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2068894782
- Cited by
- 638
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 16.06
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Synbiotic modulation of gut flora: Effect on minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.20194
- The paper
- Liu, Q., Duan, Z. P., Ha, D. K., Bengmark, S., Kurtovic, J., & Riordan, S. M. (2004). Synbiotic modulation of gut flora: Effect on minimal hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.20194
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.