The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A novel panel of blood markers to assess the degree of liver fibrosis†
Open accessAbstract
The objective was to develop new blood tests to characterize different fibrosis parameters in viral and alcoholic chronic liver diseases. Measurements included 51 blood markers and Fibrotest, Fibrospect, ELFG, APRI, and Forns scores. The clinically significant fibrosis was evaluated via Metavir staging (F2-F4), and image analysis was used to determine the area of fibrosis. In an exploratory step in 383 patients with viral hepatitis, the area under the receiving operator characteristic (AUROC) curve for stages F2-F4 in a test termed the "Fibrometer" test combining platelets, prothrombin index, aspartate aminotransferase, alpha2-macroglobulin (A2M), hyaluronate, urea, and age was 0.883 compared with 0.808 for the Fibrotest (P = .01), 0.820 for the Forns test (P = .005), and 0.794 for the APRI test (P < 10(-4)). The Fibrometer AUROC curve was 0.892 in the validating step in 120 patients. The AUROC curve for stages F2-F4 in a test combining prothrombin index, A2M, hyaluronate, and age was 0.962 in 95 patients with alcoholic liver diseases. The area of fibrosis was estimated in viral hepatitis by testing for hyaluronate, gamma-glutamyltransferase, bilirubin, platelets, and apolipoprotein A1 ((a)R(2) = 0.645), and in alcoholic liver diseases by testing for hyaluronate, prothrombin index, A2M, and platelets ((a)R(2) = 0.836). In conclusion, the pathological staging and area of liver fibrosis can be estimated using different combinations of blood markers in viral and alcoholic liver diseases. Whereas the Fibrometer has a high diagnostic accuracy for clinically significant fibrosis, blood tests for the area of liver fibrosis provide a quantitative estimation of the amount of fibrosis, which is especially useful in cirrhosis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2015) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.04.006 · Cited by 1,875
EASL Clinical Practical Guidelines: Management of Alcoholic Liver Disease
European Association for the Study of the Liver (2012) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2012.04.004 · Cited by 720
Boursier, J., Vergniol, J., Guillet, A., Hiriart, J.-B., Lannes, A., Le Bail, B., Michalak, S., Chermak, F., Bertrais, S., Foucher, J., et al. (2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2016.04.023 · Cited by 400
Non-invasive diagnosis and staging of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
Kechagias, S., Ekstedt, M., Simonsson, C., & Nasr, P. (2022) · Hormones · doi:10.1007/s42000-022-00377-8 · Cited by 39
Clinical and biological risk factors for neuropsychological impairment in alcohol use disorder
Ritz, L., Coulbault, L., Lannuzel, C., Boudehent, C., Segobin, S., Eustache, F., Vabret, F., Pitel, A. L., & Beaunieux, H. (2016) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0159616 · Cited by 33
“The FibroM-eter 1 family of blood tests [21], an alternative to the FibroScan 1 [22], combining platelets, the prothrombin index, alpha-2-Macroglobulin and hyaluronic acid, seems to be a relevant substitute for biopsy, as it has been found to have high diagnostic accuracy for the noninvasive…”
InfluentialApplying Non-Invasive Fibrosis Measurements in NAFLD/NASH: Progress to Date
Albhaisi, S., & Sanyal, A. J. (2019) · Pharmaceutical Medicine · doi:10.1007/s40290-019-00305-z · Cited by 27
Utility of Noninvasive Markers of Fibrosis in Cholestatic Liver Diseases
Corpechot, C. (2016) · Clinics in Liver Disease · doi:10.1016/j.cld.2015.08.013 · Cited by 19
Metadata
- Authors
- Calès, P., Oberti, F., Michalak, S., Hubert‐Fouchard, I., Rousselet, M., Konaté, A., Gallois, Y., Ternisien, C., Chevailler, A., & Lunel, F.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2005-12
- Volume
- 42
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1373-1381
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2044269551
- Cited by
- 560
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.