The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Increased Caffeine Consumption Is Associated With Reduced Hepatic Fibrosis
Open accessAbstract
Although coffee consumption has been associated with reduced frequency of liver disease, it is unclear whether the effect is from coffee or caffeine and whether there is an effect on hepatic fibrosis specifically. This study was undertaken to use a food-frequency instrument for dietary caffeine consumption to evaluate the relationship between caffeine intake and liver fibrosis. Patients undergoing liver biopsy completed a detailed caffeine questionnaire on three occasions over a 6-month period. Caffeine intake was compared between patients with mild and advanced liver fibrosis (bridging fibrosis/cirrhosis). Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between caffeine consumption and hepatic fibrosis. One hundred seventy-seven patients (99 male, 104 white, 121 with chronic hepatitis C virus [HCV] infection) undergoing liver biopsy completed the caffeine questionnaire on up to three occasions. Results from repeated questionnaires were consistent. Daily caffeine consumption above the 75th percentile for the cohort (308 mg = approximately 2.25 cups of coffee equivalents) was associated with reduced liver fibrosis (odds ratio [OR], 0.33; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14-0.80; P = 0.015) and the protective association persisted after controlling for age, sex, race, liver disease, body mass index, and alcohol intake in all patients (OR, 0.25; 95% CI, 0.09-0.67; P = 0.006), as well as the subset with HCV infection (OR, 0.19; 95% CI, 0.05-0.66; P = 0.009). Despite a modest trend, consumption of caffeine from sources other than coffee or of decaffeinated coffee was not associated with reduced liver fibrosis. A reliable tool for measurement of caffeine consumption demonstrated that caffeine consumption, particularly from regular coffee, above a threshold of approximately 2 coffee-cup equivalents per day, was associated with less severe hepatic fibrosis. (Hepatology 2010;51:201–209.)
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Barone, J. J., & Roberts, H. R. (1996) · Food and Chemical Toxicology · doi:10.1016/0278-6915(95)00093-3 · Cited by 705
Cited by
Caffeine as a factor influencing the functioning of the human body-friend or foe?
Rodak, K., Kokot, I., & Kratz, E. M. (2021) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu13093088 · Cited by 188
Pathophysiology of NASH: perspectives for a targeted treatment
Marra, F., & Lotersztajn, S. (2013) · Current Pharmaceutical Design · doi:10.2174/13816128113199990344 · Cited by 163
Kalthoff, S., Ehmer, U., Freiberg, N., Manns, M. P., & Strassburg, C. P. (2010) · Gastroenterology · doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2010.06.048 · Cited by 124
Toxicity of Natural Deep Eutectic Solvent Betaine:Glycerol in Rats
Benlebna, M., Ruesgas-Ramón, M., Bonafos, B., Fouret, G., Casas, F., Coudray, C., Durand, E., Cruz Figueroa-Espinoza, M., & Feillet-Coudray, C. (2018) · Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jafc.8b01746 · Cited by 90
Hepatic Stellate Cells and Liver Fibrosis
Puche, J. E., Saiman, Y., & Friedman, S. L. (2013) · Comprehensive Physiology · doi:10.1002/j.2040-4603.2013.tb00529.x · Cited by 89
Bhurwal, A., Ratta, P., Yoshitake, S., Pioppo, L., Reja, D., Dellatore, P., & Rustgi, V. (2020) · Journal of Gastrointestinal and Liver Diseases · doi:10.15403/jgld-805 · Cited by 61
Metadata
- Authors
- Modi, A. A., Feld, J. J., Park, Y., Kleiner, D. E., Everhart, J. E., Liang, J. T., & Hoofnagle, J. H.
- Venue
- Hepatology
- Published
- 2010-01
- Volume
- 51
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 201-209
- ISSN
- 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2151407038
- Cited by
- 279
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.