Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 191

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Development of hyperdynamic circulation and response to β‐blockers in compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension

Villanueva, Càndid, Albillos, Agustín, Genescà, Joan, Abraldes, Juan G., Calleja, Jose L., Aracil, Carles, Bañares, Rafael, Morillas, Rosa, Poca, María, Peñas, Beatriz, Augustin, Salvador, Garcia‐Pagan, Joan Carles, Pavel, Oana, Bosch, Jaume·2016·Hepatology

Abstract

Nonselective β‐blockers are useful to prevent bleeding in patients with cirrhosis and large varices but not to prevent the development of varices in those with compensated cirrhosis and portal hypertension (PHT). This suggests that the evolutionary stage of PHT may influence the response to β‐blockers. To characterize the hemodynamic profile of each stage of PHT in compensated cirrhosis and the response to β‐blockers according to stage, we performed a prospective, multicenter (tertiary care setting), cross‐sectional study. Hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) and systemic hemodynamic were measured in 273 patients with compensated cirrhosis before and after intravenous propranolol (0.15 mg/kg): 194 patients had an HVPG ≥10 mm Hg (clinically significant PHT [CSPH]), with either no varices (n = 80) or small varices (n = 114), and 79 had an HVPG >5 and <10 mm Hg (subclinical PHT). Patients with CSPH had higher liver stiffness (P < 0.001), worse Model for End‐Stage Liver Disease score (P < 0.001), more portosystemic collaterals (P = 0.01) and splenomegaly (P = 0.01) on ultrasound, and lower platelet count (P < 0.001) than those with subclinical PHT. Patients with CSPH had lower systemic vascular resistance (1336 ± 423 versus 1469 ± 335 dyne · s · cm‐5, P < 0.05) and higher cardiac index (3.3 ± 0.9 versus 2.8 ± 0.4 L/min/m 2, P < 0.01). After propranolol, the HVPG decreased significantly in both groups, although the reduction was greater in those with CSPH (‐16 ± 12% versus ‐8 ± 9%, P < 0.01). The HVPG decreased ≥10% from baseline in 69% of patients with CSPH versus 35% with subclinical PHT (P < 0.001) and decreased ≥20% in 40% versus 13%, respectively (P = 0.001). Conclusion: Patients with subclinical PHT have less hyperdynamic circulation and significantly lower portal pressure reduction after acute β‐blockade than those with CSPH, suggesting that β‐blockers are more suitable to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with CSPH than in earlier stages. (H epatology 2016;63:197–206)

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.28264

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 191

Metadata

Authors
Villanueva, C., Albillos, A., Genescà, J., Abraldes, J. G., Calleja, J. L., Aracil, C., Bañares, R., Morillas, R., Poca, M., Peñas, B., Augustin, S., Garcia‐Pagan, J. C., Pavel, O., & Bosch, J.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
2015-11-26
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
197-206
ISSN
  • 0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3350
OpenAlex
W2099295251
Cited by
191
References
0
FWCI
8.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Development of hyperdynamic circulation and response to β‐blockers in compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.28264
The paper
Villanueva, C., Albillos, A., Genescà, J., Abraldes, J. G., Calleja, J. L., Aracil, C., Bañares, R., Morillas, R., Poca, M., Peñas, B., Augustin, S., Garcia‐Pagan, J. C., Pavel, O., & Bosch, J. (2016). Development of hyperdynamic circulation and response to β‐blockers in compensated cirrhosis with portal hypertension. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.28264

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.