Cited by 711Liver Disease and TransplantationHeart Failure Treatment and ManagementLiver physiology and pathology

β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis in patients with clinically significant portal hypertension (PREDESCI): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial

Villanueva, Càndid, Albillos, Agustín, Genescà, Joan, Garcia-Pagan, Joan C, Calleja, José L, Aracil, Carles, Bañares, Rafael, Morillas, Rosa M +7 more·2019·The Lancet

Abstract

Background Clinical decompensation of cirrhosis is associated with poor prognosis. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), defined by a hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG) ≥10 mm Hg, is the strongest predictor of decompensation. This study aimed at assessing whether lowering HVPG with β blockers could decrease the risk of decompensation or death in compensated cirrhosis with CSPH.Methods This study on β blockers to prevent decompensation of cirrhosis with portal hypertension (PREDESCI) was an investigator-initiated, double-blind, randomised controlled trial done in eight hospitals in Spain. We enrolled patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH without high-risk varices. All participants had HVPG measurements with assessment of acute HVPG-response to intravenous propranolol. Responders (HVPG-decrease ≥10%) were randomly assigned to propranolol (up to 160 mg twice a day) versus placebo and non-responders to carvedilol (≤25 mg/day) versus placebo. Doses were individually determined during an open-label titration period after which randomisation was done with 1:1 allocation by a centralised web-based system. The primary endpoint was incidence of cirrhosis decompensation (defined as development of ascites, bleeding, or overt encephalopathy) or death. Since death in compensated cirrhosis is usually unrelated to the liver, an intention-to-treat analysis considering deaths unrelated to the liver as competing events was done. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01059396. The trial is now completed.Findings Between Jan 18, 2010, and July 31, 2013, 631 patients were evaluated and 201 were randomly assigned. 101 patients received placebo and 100 received active treatment (67 propranolol and 33 carvedilol). The primary endpoint occurred in 16 (16%) of 100 patients in the β blockers group versus 27 (27%) of 101 in the placebo group (hazard ratio [HR] 0·51, 95% CI 0·26-0·97, p=0·041). The difference was due to a reduced incidence of ascites (HR=0·44, 95%CI=0·20-0·97, p=0·0297). The overall incidence of adverse events was similar in both groups. Six patients (four in the β blockers group) had severe adverse events.Interpretation Long-term treatment with β blockers could increase decompensation-free survival in patients with compensated cirrhosis and CSPH, mainly by reducing the incidence of ascites.Funding Spanish Ministries of Health and Economy.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)31875-0

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Villanueva, C., Albillos, A., Genescà, J., Garcia-Pagan, J. C., Calleja, J. L., Aracil, C., Bañares, R., Morillas, R. M., Poca, M., Peñas, B., Augustin, S., Abraldes, J. G., Alvarado, E., Torres, F., & Bosch, J.
Affiliations
  • Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona (ES)
  • Universidad de Alcalá (ES)
  • Hospital Universitari Arnau de Vilanova (ES)
  • Universidad Complutense de Madrid (ES)
Corresponding author
Villanueva, Càndid
Venue
The Lancet
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
393
Issue
10181
Pages
1597-1608
ISSN
  • 0099-5355 (ISSN-L)
  • 0140-6736
OpenAlex
W2922822790
Cited by
711
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 87 · 2025: 117 · 2024: 137 · 2023: 119 · 2022: 103 · 2021: 75 · 2020: 52 · 2019: 20 · 2018: 1
FWCI
39.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Lancet (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Instituto de Salud Carlos III (EC08/00087, PI10/01552, PI13/02535, PS09/00485, PI14/00876, and PI15/00066)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Disease and Transplantation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Failure Treatment and Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
cirrhosis decompensation, clinically significant portal hypertension, beta-blockers, propranolol, carvedilol, hepatic venous pressure gradient, ascites, variceal bleeding, hepatic encephalopathy, compensated cirrhosis, placebo response, competing events, mortality, adverse events
MeSH terms
Carvedilol, Administration, Oral, Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Adult, Aged, Ascites, Double-Blind Method, Female, Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage, Hepatic Encephalopathy, Humans, Hypertension, Portal, Liver Cirrhosis, Male, Middle Aged, Propranolol, Severity of Illness Index, Proportional Hazards Models

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review