Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 513

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Pilot–Controlled Trial of the Extracorporeal Liver Assist Device in Acute Liver Failure

Open access
Ellis, A J, Hughes, R D, Wendon, J A, Dunne, J, Langley, P G, Kelly, J H, Gislason, G T, Sussman, N L, Williams, R·1996·Hepatology

Abstract

The objective of this pilot controlled study was to evaluate the extracorporeal liver assist device (ELAD) in patients with acute liver failure who were judged to still have a significant chance of survival (approximately 50%) and in those who had already fulfilled criteria for transplantation. Twenty–four patients were divided into two groups, 17 with a potentially recoverable lesion (group I) and 7 listed for transplantation (group II), and then randomly allocated to ELAD haemoperfusion or control. The median period of ELAD haemoperfusion was 72 hours (range 3–168 h). Biocompatibility of the device was good, with no acceleration in platelet consumption, and haemodynamic stability was maintained. Two patients were withdrawn from the study because of worsening of preexisting disseminated intravascular coagulation in one case and a hypersensitivity reaction in the other. Deterioration with respect to encephalopathy grade was more frequent in the control patients, 7 of 12 (58%), than in the ELAD–treated patients, 3 of 12 (25%). In group I where survival for the ELAD cases was 7 of 9 (78%), there was a higher than expected survival in the controls, 6 of 8 (75%). For group II cases, survival was 1 of 3 (33%) for the ELAD– treated patients, and 1 of 4 (25%) for the controls. Both of the survivors underwent transplantation. Assessment of additive function for the device revealed an improvement in galactose elimination capacity after 6 hours of haemoperfusion. Based on the results of this pilot–controlled trial, better indices of prognosis will be required, in addition to those used to select for transplantation, if patients at an earlier stage of clinical deterioration are to be included in future studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hep.510240625

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Cited by

See all 513

Metadata

Authors
Ellis, A. J., Hughes, R. D., Wendon, J. A., Dunne, J., Langley, P. G., Kelly, J. H., Gislason, G. T., Sussman, N. L., & Williams, R.
Venue
Hepatology
Published
1996-12
Volume
24
Issue
6
Pages
1446-1451
ISSN
0270-9139 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2119636014
Cited by
513
References
1
FWCI
9.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Pilot–Controlled Trial of the Extracorporeal Liver Assist Device in Acute Liver Failure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hep.510240625
The paper
Ellis, A. J., Hughes, R. D., Wendon, J. A., Dunne, J., Langley, P. G., Kelly, J. H., Gislason, G. T., Sussman, N. L., & Williams, R. (1996). Pilot–Controlled Trial of the Extracorporeal Liver Assist Device in Acute Liver Failure. Hepatology. https://doi.org/10.1002/hep.510240625

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.