Cited by 33Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchGenetics and Neurodevelopmental DisordersAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications

Quantification of postsynaptic density proteins: Glutamate receptor subunits and scaffolding proteins

Shinohara, Yoshiaki·2012·Hippocampus

Abstract

The postsynaptic density (PSD) protein complex has long been a major target of proteomics in neuroscience. As the number of glutamate receptors on a synapse is one of the main determinants of synaptic efficacy, determining the absolute numbers of receptors in the PSD is necessary for estimating the amplitude of the excitatory postsynaptic current (EPSC) in individual synapses. Moreover, as the receptor molecules are embedded in a macromolecular complex within the PSD, stoichiometry between the receptors and other PSD proteins could help explain the functional and regional specialization of the synapses and their possible roles in synaptic plasticity. Here, I review various studies concerned with the quantification of PSD proteins.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hipo.20950

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The number of NMDARs at spine synapses and perhaps filopodia synapses is much less variable, averaging roughly 20, and this number is largely independent of PSD size.

    “The number of NMDARs at spine synapses and perhaps filopodia synapses is much less variable, averaging roughly 20, and this number is largely independent of PSD size (143, 438, 439).”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [439]

  • The number of AMPARs at dendritic spine synapses is highly variable but averages roughly 50, and this number strongly correlates with the size of the PSD.

    “The number of AMPARs at dendritic spine synapses is highly variable but averages roughly 50 (143, 438, 439), and this number strongly correlates with the size of the PSD.”

    From Synaptic memory and CaMKII (2023) · cites this paper as [439]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Shinohara, Y.
Affiliations
RIKEN Center for Brain Science (JP)
Corresponding author
Shinohara, Yoshiaki
Venue
Hippocampus
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2011-05-18
Volume
22
Issue
5
Pages
942-953
ISSN
  • 1050-9631 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1063
OpenAlex
W1984972580
Cited by
33
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 4
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Hippocampus (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (23590273)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetics and Neurodevelopmental Disorders
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Keywords
postsynaptic density, glutamate receptor subunits, scaffold proteins, protein stoichiometry, excitatory postsynaptic currents, synaptic plasticity, absolute protein quantification
MeSH terms
Animals, Carrier Proteins, Hippocampus, Membrane Proteins, Microscopy, Fluorescence, Nerve Tissue Proteins, Neuronal Plasticity, Mass Spectrometry, Receptors, N-Methyl-D-Aspartate, Receptors, Glutamate, Receptors, AMPA, Excitatory Postsynaptic Potentials, Protein Subunits, Adaptor Proteins, Signal Transducing, Mice, Rats, Post-Synaptic Density

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review