Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 224

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Work‐nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers

Raghuram, Sumita, Wiesenfeld, Batia·2004·Human Resource Management

Abstract

A primary objective of organizational virtual work programs (e.g., providing the option to employees to work from home) is the reduction of employees'work‐nonwork conflict and job stress. In this study, we find some preliminary evidence suggesting that virtual work is negatively related to work‐nonwork conflict and job stress. We identify the work factors (clarity of appraisal criteria, interpersonal trust, and organizational connectedness) and individual factors (self‐efficacy and ability to structure the workday) associated with work‐nonwork conflict and find that these associations are moderated by the extent of virtual work. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hrm.20019

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 224

Metadata

Authors
Raghuram, S., & Wiesenfeld, B.
Venue
Human Resource Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-06
Volume
43
Issue
2-3
Pages
259-277
ISSN
  • 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-050X
OpenAlex
W2167186128
Cited by
224
References
4
FWCI
8.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Work‐nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/hrm.20019
The paper
Raghuram, S., & Wiesenfeld, B. (2004). Work‐nonwork conflict and job stress among virtual workers. Human Resource Management. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.20019

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.