Cited by 1,621Stress Responses and CortisolHealth and Well-being StudiesAttachment and Relationship Dynamics

The impact of daily stress on health and mood: psychological and social resources as mediators

DeLongis, Anita, Folkman, Susan, Lazarus, Richard S.·1988·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

This study examined daily stress processes among 75 married couples across 20 assessments during a 6-month period. The somatic and psychological effects of common everyday hassles were investigated. Overall, there was a significant relationship between daily stress and the occurrence of both concurrent and subsequent health problems such as flu, sore throat, headaches, and backaches. The relationship of daily stress to mood disturbance was more complex. The negative effects of stress on mood were limited to a single day, with the following day characterized by mood scores that were better than usual. Furthermore, striking individual differences were found in the extent to which daily stress was associated with health and mood across time. Participants with unsupportive social relationships and low self-esteem were more likely to experience an increase in psychological and somatic problems both on and following stressful days than were participants high in self-esteem and social support. These data suggest that persons with low psychosocial resources are vulnerable to illness and mood disturbance when their stress levels increase, even if they generally have little stress in their lives.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.54.3.486

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • High self-esteem tends to be strongly associated with internal locus of control.

    “Conversely, high selfesteem tends to be strongly associated with internal locus of control, or the confident perception that one's outcomes are determined by one's actions (DeLongis et al., 1988;Lo, 2002;Petrie and Rotheram, 1982;Whisman and Kwon, 1993).”
  • Low self-esteem is associated with greater amounts of perceived daily hassles and chronic stressors, even after correcting for environmental factors, occupation, age, and gender.

    “Low self-esteem is associated with greater amounts of perceived daily hassles and chronic stressors, even after correcting for environmental factors, occupation, age, and gender.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
DeLongis, A., Folkman, S., & Lazarus, R. S.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
1988
Volume
54
Issue
3
Pages
486-495
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2062086084
Cited by
1,621
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 19 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 51 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 59 · 2016: 53 · 2015: 63 · 2014: 58 · 2013: 64 · 2012: 67
FWCI
10.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA02976)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Behavioral Neuroscience › Stress Responses and Cortisol
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
Keywords
daily stress, married couples, somatic symptoms, mood disturbance, self-esteem, social support, psychosocial resources, individual differences, stress vulnerability
MeSH terms
Adult, Disease Susceptibility, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychological Tests, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Risk Factors, Self Concept, Social Environment, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Mood Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review