Cited by 886Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorSocial Capital and NetworksSocial Power and Status Dynamics

At What Level (and in Whom) We Trust: Trust Across Multiple Organizational Levels

Fulmer, C. Ashley, Gelfand, Michele J.·2012·Journal of Management

Abstract

Despite the importance of trust across multiple levels in organizations, extant reviews have focused predominantly on trust at the individual level. A systematic review of trust research across levels and trust referents is sorely needed to synthesize the growing number of both micro and macro studies on this topic. Moreover, as trust is a linchpin for divergent areas, such as negotiation, leadership, team processes, human resource management, organizational change, entrepreneurship, and strategic alliances, a multilevel–multireferent review of trust can facilitate integration in the field of organizational sciences. In this review, the authors adopt a levels-of-analysis approach to organize the research on trust between 2000 and 2011 in multiple referents that include interpersonal, team, and organization at the individual, team, and organizational levels and analyze the similarities and differences in antecedents, consequences, and theoretical perspectives dominant at each level. Building on this foundation, the authors identify current strengths, weaknesses, and research gaps; offer recommendations for integration across levels and referents; and discuss lingering questions that research so far has overlooked. In doing so, the review offers a systematic and comprehensive view of the current state of the trust literature in organizational sciences and provides a blueprint for future research.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0149206312439327

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fulmer, C. A., & Gelfand, M. J.
Affiliations
University of Maryland, College Park (US)
Venue
Journal of Management
Published
2012-05-29
Volume
38
Issue
4
Pages
1167-1230
ISSN
  • 0149-2063 (ISSN-L)
  • 1557-1211
OpenAlex
W2108104236
Cited by
886
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 84 · 2024: 68 · 2023: 64 · 2022: 66 · 2021: 79 · 2020: 88 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 64 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 58 · 2015: 48 · 2014: 40 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 6
FWCI
79.04
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Management (publishedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
Keywords
trust, levels of analysis, interpersonal trust, team trust, organizational trust, antecedents of trust, consequences of trust, research gaps

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review