The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Leveraging diversity to improve business performance: Research findings and recommendations for organizations
Open accessAbstract
Research findings from industrial and organizational psychology and other disciplines cast doubt on the simple assertion that a diverse workforce inevitably improves business performance. Instead, research and theory suggest several conditions necessary to manage diversity initiatives successfully and reap organizational benefits. This article reviews empirical research and theory on the relationship between workforce diversity and organizational performance and outlines practical steps HR practitioners can take to manage diversity initiatives successfully and enhance the positive outcomes. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Social Identity Theory of Intergroup Behavior
Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (2004) · Political Psychology · doi:10.4324/9780203505984-16 · Cited by 13,467
Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. E. (1998) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.124.2.262 · Cited by 4,180
Exploring the Black Box: An Analysis of Work Group Diversity, Conflict and Performance
Pelled, L. H., Eisenhardt, K. M., & Xin, K. R. (1999) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667029 · Cited by 2,971
Ely, R. J., & Thomas, D. A. (2001) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2667087 · Cited by 2,433 · cited 2×
“Ely and Thomas (2001) contrasted three frames. The integration-and-learning perspective approaches the diversity program as a vehicle for rethinking the primary tasks and processes of the organization. In the access-and-legitimacy perspective, the diversity program is seen as a strategy of gaining entry into markets t…”
BackgroundWebber, S. S., & Donahue, L. M. (2001) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/014920630102700202 · Cited by 518
Cited by
A Multi-Level Process Model for Understanding Diversity Practice Effectiveness
Nishii, L. H., Khattab, J., Shemla, M., & Paluch, R. M. (2018) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0044 · Cited by 233
Condoning stereotyping? How awareness of stereotyping prevalence impacts expression of stereotypes.
Duguid, M. M., & Thomas-Hunt, M. C. (2015) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0037908 · Cited by 200
Lightfoote, J. B., Fielding, J. R., Deville, C., Gunderman, R. B., Morgan, G. N., Pandharipande, P. V., Duerinckx, A. J., Wynn, R. B., & Macura, K. J. (2014) · Journal of the American College of Radiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacr.2014.03.007 · Cited by 188
A Meta-Analysis of Hiring Discrimination Against Muslims and Arabs
Bartkoski, T., Lynch, E., Witt, C., & Rudolph, C. (2018) · Personnel Assessment and Decisions · doi:10.25035/pad.2018.02.001 · Cited by 37
Talent Management in Higher Education Institutions: Developing Leadership Competencies
Roha Mohamed Jais, I., Yahaya, N., & K Ghani, E. (2021) · Journal of Education and e-Learning Research · doi:10.20448/journal.509.2021.81.8.15 · Cited by 24
Metadata
- Authors
- Jayne, M. E. A., & Dipboye, R. L.
- Venue
- Human Resource Management
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-11-17
- Volume
- 43
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 409-424
- ISSN
- 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
- 1099-050X
- OpenAlex
- W2035939766
- Cited by
- 480
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 12.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
