Cited by 325Job Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorEmployee Performance and ManagementHuman Resource and Talent Management

Well‐being‐oriented human resource management practices and employee performance in the Chinese banking sector: The role of social climate and resilience

Cooper, Brian, Wang, Jue, Bartram, Timothy, Cooke, Fang Lee·2019·Human Resource Management

Abstract

Drawing upon positive psychology and a social relational perspective, this article examines the relationship between well‐being‐oriented human resource management (HRM) practices and employee performance. Our multilevel model examines relationships among collectively experienced well‐being‐oriented HRM practices, social climate (characterized by trust, cooperation, and shared codes and language that exist among individuals within the organization), employee resilience, and employee (in‐role) performance. Based on the two‐wave data obtained from 561 employees and their managers within 62 bank branches in 16 Chinese banks, our multilevel analyses provide support for our four hypotheses. First, we found a positive relationship between well‐being‐oriented HRM practices and social climate. Second, social climate mediated the relationship between well‐being‐oriented HRM practices and employee resilience. Third, we found a positive relationship between resilience and employee performance. Finally, employee resilience mediated the relationship between social climate and employee performance. This study is one of the first to unpack the social mechanisms through which well‐being‐oriented HRM practices increase development of resilience and subsequent employee performance at the workplace, namely through influencing group feelings of social climate.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/hrm.21934

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cooper, B., Wang, J., Bartram, T., & Cooke, F. L.
Affiliations
  • Monash University (AU)
  • Southwestern University of Finance and Economics (CN)
  • RMIT University (AU)
Corresponding author
Wang, Jue
Venue
Human Resource Management
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2018-08-17
Volume
58
Issue
1
Pages
85-97
ISSN
  • 0090-4848 (ISSN-L)
  • 1099-050X
OpenAlex
W2885452364
Cited by
325
References
72
Citations by year
2026: 43 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 61 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6
FWCI
30.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Resource Management (publishedVersion)
  • RMIT Research Repository (RMIT University Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Figshare (submittedVersion)
  • Griffith Research Online (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Natural Science Foundation of China
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Human Factors and Ergonomics › Employee Performance and Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Human Resource and Talent Management
Keywords
employee performance, social climate, employee resilience, trust, cooperation, positive psychology, banking sector, Chinese banks, mediation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review