Cited by 385Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingCorporate Social Responsibility and SustainabilityEmployer Branding and e-HRM

Corporate social responsibility and human resource management: A systematic review and conceptual analysis

Open access
Voegtlin, Christian, Greenwood, Michelle·2016·Human Resource Management Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.hrmr.2015.12.003

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is increased recognition that HRM has a potentially vital role to play in addressing sustainability challenges.

    “There is increased recognition that HRM has a potentially vital role to play in addressing these challenges, for example, by creating employee engagement with the firm's sustainability activities, creating performance management and incentive systems aligned with an emphasis on social and environmental sustainability, designing workplace-based practices that help the firm reduce harmful”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Voegtlin, C., & Greenwood, M.
Affiliations
  • Audencia Business School (FR)
  • Monash University (AU)
Corresponding author
Voegtlin, Christian
Venue
Human Resource Management Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
26
Issue
3
Pages
181-197
ISSN
1053-4822 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2257653895
Cited by
385
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 23 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 49 · 2023: 45 · 2022: 47 · 2021: 47 · 2020: 48 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 2
FWCI
10.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Resource Management Review (acceptedVersion)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (acceptedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Monash University
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (100018_149937)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Corporate Social Responsibility and Sustainability
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Employer Branding and e-HRM
Keywords
corporate social responsibility, human resource management, instrumental perspective, political attitudes, conceptual framework

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review