Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 244

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype

Open access
Pasmant, Eric, Sabbagh, Audrey, Spurlock, Gill, Laurendeau, Ingrid, Grillo, Elisa, Hamel, Marie-José, Martin, Ludovic, Barbarot, Sébastien, Leheup, Bruno, Rodriguez, Diana, Lacombe, Didier, Dollfus, Hélène, Pasquier, Laurent, Isidor, Bertrand, Ferkal, Salah, Soulier, Jean, Sanson, Marc, Dieux-Coeslier, Anne, Bièche, Ivan, Parfait, Béatrice, Vidaud, Michel, Wolkenstein, Pierre, Upadhyaya, Meena, Vidaud, Dominique·2010·Human Mutation

Abstract

In 5-10% of patients, neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1) results from microdeletions that encompass the entire NF1 gene and a variable number of flanking genes. Two recurrent microdeletion types are found in most cases, with microdeletion breakpoints located in paralogous regions flanking NF1 (proximal NF1-REP-a and distal NF1-REP-c for the 1.4 Mb type-1 microdeletion, and SUZ12 and SUZ12P for the 1.2 Mb type-2 microdeletion). A more severe phenotype is usually associated with NF1 microdeletion patients than in those with intragenic mutations. We characterized NF1 microdeletions in 70 unrelated NF1 microdeleted patients using a high-resolution NF1 custom array comparative genomic hybridization (CGH). Genotype-phenotype correlations were studied in 58 of these microdeletion patients and compared to 389 patients with intragenic truncating NF1 mutations and phenotyped in the same standardized way. Our results confirmed in an unbiased manner the existence of a contiguous gene syndrome with a significantly higher incidence of learning disabilities and facial dysmorphism in microdeleted patients compared to patients with intragenic NF1 mutations. Microdeleted NF1 patients also showed a trend toward significance for childhood overgrowth. High-resolution array-CGH identified a new recurrent approximately 1.0 Mb microdeletion type, designated as type-3, with breakpoints in the paralogous regions middle NF1-REP-b and distal NF1-REP-c.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.21271

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 244

Metadata

Authors
Pasmant, E., Sabbagh, A., Spurlock, G., Laurendeau, I., Grillo, E., Hamel, M.-J., Martin, L., Barbarot, S., Leheup, B., Rodriguez, D., Lacombe, D., Dollfus, H., Pasquier, L., Isidor, B., Ferkal, S., Soulier, J., Sanson, M., Dieux-Coeslier, A., Bièche, I., Parfait, B., Vidaud, M., Wolkenstein, P., Upadhyaya, M., & Vidaud, D.
Venue
Human Mutation
Published
2010-05-10
Volume
31
Issue
6
Pages
E1506-E1518
ISSN
  • 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1004
OpenAlex
W2027575976
Cited by
244
References
1
FWCI
7.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/humu.21271
The paper
Pasmant, E., Sabbagh, A., Spurlock, G., Laurendeau, I., Grillo, E., Hamel, M.-J., Martin, L., Barbarot, S., Leheup, B., Rodriguez, D., Lacombe, D., Dollfus, H., Pasquier, L., Isidor, B., Ferkal, S., Soulier, J., Sanson, M., Dieux-Coeslier, A., Bièche, I., . . . Vidaud, D. (2010). NF1 microdeletions in neurofibromatosis type 1: from genotype to phenotype. Human Mutation. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.21271

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.