Cited by 48DNA Repair MechanismsGenomics and Rare DiseasesGenetic and rare skin diseases.

Novel XPG ( ERCC5 ) Mutations Affect DNA Repair and Cell Survival after Ultraviolet but not Oxidative Stress

Open access
Soltys, Daniela T., Rocha, Clarissa R. R., Lerner, Letícia K., de Souza, Tiago A., Munford, Veridiana, Cabral, Fernanda, Nardo, Tiziana, Stefanini, Miria +3 more·2013·Human Mutation

Abstract

Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most flexible of all known DNA-repair mechanisms, and XPG is a 3'-endonuclease that participates in NER. Mutations in this gene (ERCC5) may result in the human syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and, in some cases, in the complex phenotype of Cockayne syndrome (CS). Two Brazilian XP siblings, who were mildly affected, were investigated and classified into the XP-G group. The cells from these patients were highly ultraviolet (UV) sensitive but not sensitive to photosensitized methylene blue, an agent that causes oxidative stress. This phenotype is in contrast to XP-G/CS cells, which are highly sensitive to this oxidative agent. Sequencing revealed a compound heterozygous genotype with two novel missense mutations: c.83C>A (p.Ala28Asp) and c.2904G>C (p.Trp968Cys). The first mutation maps to the catalytic site of the XPG protein, whereas the second may compromise binding to DNA. Functional assays indicated that the mutated alleles were unable to perform the complete repair of UV-irradiated plasmids; however, full correction was observed for oxidatively damaged plasmids. Therefore, the XP phenotype of these patients is caused by novel missense mutations that specifically affect DNA repair for UV- but not oxidative-stress-induced DNA damage, and implications for XP versus XP/CS phenotype are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.22259

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The XP phenotype may arise from missense mutations in the XPG gene that generally result in a stable XPG protein, whereas XP/CS originates from mutations that result in a truncated and/or unstable XPG protein.

    “These observations suggest that the XP phenotype may arise from missense mutations in the XPG gene that generally result in a stable XPG protein, whereas XP/CS originates from mutations that result in a truncated and/or unstable XPG protein [238][239][240].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

1 retracted

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Soltys, D. T., Rocha, C. R. R., Lerner, L. K., de Souza, T. A., Munford, V., Cabral, F., Nardo, T., Stefanini, M., Sarasin, A., Cabral‐Neto, J. B., & Menck, C. F. M.
Affiliations
  • Universidade de São Paulo (BR)
  • Department of Microbiology, Institute of Biomedical Sciences University of São Paulo São Paulo SP Brazil
  • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (BR)
  • Istituto di Genetica Molecolare Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche Pavia Italy
  • Istituto di Genetica Molecolare (IT)
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • Instituto de Biofísica Carlos Chagas Filho Federal University of Rio de Janeiro Rio de Janeiro RJ Brazil
Corresponding author
Menck, Carlos F. M.
Venue
Human Mutation
Published
2013-03
Volume
34
Issue
3
Pages
481-489
ISSN
  • 1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-1004
OpenAlex
W2112970145
Cited by
48
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
2.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Human Mutation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
  • Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
Keywords
XPG, ERCC5, nucleotide excision repair, xeroderma pigmentosum, Cockayne syndrome, missense mutations, UV-induced DNA damage, oxidative DNA damage, compound heterozygosity, catalytic site, DNA repair deficiency, cell survival
MeSH terms
DNA Excision Repair Protein ERCC-5, Adolescent, Alleles, Amino Acid Sequence, Brazil, Cell Line, Cell Survival, Cloning, Molecular, Cockayne Syndrome, DNA Damage, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Endonucleases, Female, Fibroblasts, Heterozygote, Humans, Male, Molecular Sequence Data, Nuclear Proteins, Phenotype, Protein Conformation, Transcription Factors, Ultraviolet Rays, Xeroderma Pigmentosum, Sequence Alignment, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Oxidative Stress, Mutation, Missense, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review