Cited by 113DNA Repair MechanismsNuclear Structure and FunctionGenetic and rare skin diseases.

True XP group E patients have a defective UV-damaged DNA binding protein complex and mutations in DDB2 which reveal the functional domains of its p48 product

Rapic-Otrin, V.·2003·Human Molecular Genetics

Abstract

Xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) is a skin cancer-prone autosomal recessive disease characterized by inability to repair UV-induced DNA damage. The major form of XP is defective in nucleotide excision repair (NER) and comprises seven complementation groups (A-G). The genes defective in all groups have been identified unambiguously with the exception of group E. The cells of some XP-E patients are deficient in a protein complex (consisting of two subunits: p127/DDBI and p48/DDB2) which binds to UV-damaged DNA (UV-DDB) and is specifically involved in the removal of photoproducts from the non-transcribed regions of the genome. However, other XP-E patients have been reported not to lack UV-damaged DNA binding activity (DDB(+)). Here we describe several genetically unrelated XP-E patients, not previously analyzed in depth, each carrying two mutated alleles for DDB2, causing either a single amino acid change or a protein truncation or internal deletion. These defects result in a severe decrease of detectable p48 protein, abolish interaction with the p127 subunit, and produce a deficiency in UV-DDB binding activity (DDB(-)). The role of p48 in the repair defect of these patients was demonstrated in vivo and in vitro. Investigation of four DDB(+) cell strains from patients previously assigned to XP-E, allowed us to reclassify all of them into other groups and to show that they do not share the molecular and biochemical features typical for XP-E. Besides confirming that the true XP-E phenot…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/hmg/ddg174

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rapic-Otrin, V.
Venue
Human Molecular Genetics
Published
2003-07-01
Volume
12
Issue
13
Pages
1507-1522
ISSN
  • 0964-6906 (ISSN-L)
  • 1460-2083
OpenAlex
W2156518131
Cited by
113
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Human Molecular Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Nuclear Structure and Function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and rare skin diseases.
Keywords
DDB2, nucleotide excision repair, UV-induced DNA damage, complementation groups, functional domains, truncating mutations
MeSH terms
Adult, Alleles, Cell Nucleus, Cells, Cultured, DNA Mutational Analysis, DNA Repair, DNA-Binding Proteins, Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation, Exons, Female, Genotype, Humans, Male, Models, Genetic, Mutation, Phenotype, Precipitin Tests, Protein Binding, Ultraviolet Rays, Xeroderma Pigmentosum, Immunoblotting, Genome, Gene Deletion, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Protein Structure, Tertiary

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review