Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 300

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing can Replace Sanger Sequencing in Clinical Diagnostics

Open access
Sikkema-Raddatz, Birgit, Johansson, Lennart F., de Boer, Eddy N., Almomani, Rowida, Boven, Ludolf G., van den Berg, Maarten P., van Spaendonck-Zwarts, Karin Y., van Tintelen, J. Peter, Sijmons, Rolf H., Jongbloed, Jan D. H., Sinke, Richard J.·2013·Human Mutation

Abstract

Mutation detection through exome sequencing allows simultaneous analysis of all coding sequences of genes. However, it cannot yet replace Sanger sequencing (SS) in diagnostics because of incomplete representation and coverage of exons leading to missing clinically relevant mutations. Targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS), in which a selected fraction of genes is sequenced, may circumvent these shortcomings. We aimed to determine whether the sensitivity and specificity of targeted NGS is equal to those of SS. We constructed a targeted enrichment kit that includes 48 genes associated with hereditary cardiomyopathies. In total, 84 individuals with cardiomyopathies were sequenced using 151 bp paired-end reads on an Illumina MiSeq sequencer. The reproducibility was tested by repeating the entire procedure for five patients. The coverage of ≥30 reads per nucleotide, our major quality criterion, was 99% and in total ∼21,000 variants were identified. Confirmation with SS was performed for 168 variants (155 substitutions, 13 indels). All were confirmed, including a deletion of 18 bp and an insertion of 6 bp. The reproducibility was nearly 100%. We demonstrate that targeted NGS of a disease-specific subset of genes is equal to the quality of SS and it can therefore be reliably implemented as a stand-alone diagnostic test.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/humu.22332

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 22 references

Cited by

See all 300

Metadata

Authors
Sikkema-Raddatz, B., Johansson, L. F., de Boer, E. N., Almomani, R., Boven, L. G., van den Berg, M. P., van Spaendonck-Zwarts, K. Y., van Tintelen, J. P., Sijmons, R. H., Jongbloed, J. D. H., & Sinke, R. J.
Venue
Human Mutation
Published
2013-04-29
Volume
34
Issue
7
Pages
1035-1042
ISSN
1059-7794 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2142453541
Cited by
300
References
22
FWCI
25.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing can Replace Sanger Sequencing in Clinical Diagnostics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1002/humu.22332
The paper
Sikkema-Raddatz, B., Johansson, L. F., de Boer, E. N., Almomani, R., Boven, L. G., van den Berg, M. P., van Spaendonck-Zwarts, K. Y., van Tintelen, J. P., Sijmons, R. H., Jongbloed, J. D. H., & Sinke, R. J. (2013). Targeted Next-Generation Sequencing can Replace Sanger Sequencing in Clinical Diagnostics. Human Mutation. https://doi.org/10.1002/humu.22332

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.